Literature DB >> 23912223

Optimized dynamic framing for PET-based myocardial blood flow estimation.

Jeffrey A Kolthammer1, Raymond F Muzic.   

Abstract

An optimal experiment design methodology was developed to select the framing schedule to be used in dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) for estimation of myocardial blood flow using (82)Rb. A compartment model and an arterial input function based on measured data were used to calculate a D-optimality criterion for a wide range of candidate framing schedules. To validate the optimality calculation, noisy time-activity curves were simulated, from which parameter values were estimated using an efficient and robust decomposition of the estimation problem. D-optimized schedules improved estimate precision compared to non-optimized schedules, including previously published schedules. To assess robustness, a range of physiologic conditions were simulated. Schedules that were optimal for one condition were nearly-optimal for others. The effect of infusion duration was investigated. Optimality was better for shorter than for longer tracer infusion durations, with the optimal schedule for the shortest infusion duration being nearly optimal for other durations. Together this suggests that a framing schedule optimized for one set of conditions will also work well for others and it is not necessary to use different schedules for different infusion durations or for rest and stress studies. The method for optimizing schedules is general and could be applied in other dynamic PET imaging studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912223     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Feasibility of dynamic stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sangwon Han; Young-Hak Kim; Jung-Min Ahn; Soo-Jin Kang; Jungsu S Oh; Eonwoo Shin; Changhwan Sung; Sun Young Chae; Seung-Jung Park; Gillan Grimberg; Gil Kovalski; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Optimization of temporal sampling for 82rubidium PET myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Benjamin C Lee; Jonathan B Moody; Richard L Weinberg; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The effect of high count rates on cardiac perfusion quantification in a simultaneous PET-MR system using a cardiac perfusion phantom.

Authors:  Jim O' Doherty; Zacharias Chalampalakis; Paul Schleyer; Muhummad Sohaib Nazir; Amedeo Chiribiri; Paul K Marsden
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-12-11

5.  Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Adrian Ocneanu; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Mark Lubberink; Fabien Hyafil; Antti Saraste; Riemer H J A Slart; Denis Agostini; Carmela Nappi; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Dynamic cardiac PET motion correction using 3D normalized gradient fields in patients and phantom simulations.

Authors:  Jonathon A Nye; Marina Piccinelli; Doyeon Hwang; Charles David Cooke; Jin Chul Paeng; Joo Myung Lee; Sang-Geon Cho; Russell Folks; Hee-Seung Bom; Bon-Kwon Koo; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.506

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.