Literature DB >> 23911605

Refining patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy.

Stephen H Culp1, Rian J Dickstein2, H Barton Grossman2, Shanna M Pretzsch2, Sima Porten2, Siamak Daneshmand3, Jie Cai3, Susan Groshen3, Arlene Siefker-Radtke4, Randall E Millikan4, Bogdan Czerniak2, Neema Navai2, Matthew F Wszolek2, Ashish M Kamat2, Colin P N Dinney5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the survival of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy to confirm the utility of existing clinical tools to identify low risk patients who could be treated with radical cystectomy alone and a high risk group most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2010. Patients were considered high risk based on the clinical presence of hydroureteronephrosis, cT3b-T4a disease, and/or histological evidence of lymphovascular invasion, micropapillary or neuroendocrine features on transurethral resection. We evaluated survival (disease specific, progression-free and overall) and rate of pathological up staging. An independent cohort of patients from another institution was used to confirm our findings.
RESULTS: We identified 98 high risk and 199 low risk patients eligible for analysis. High risk patients exhibited decreased 5-year overall survival (47.0% vs 64.8%) and decreased disease specific (64.3% vs 83.5%) and progression-free (62.0% vs 84.1%) survival probabilities compared to low risk patients (p <0.001). Survival outcomes were confirmed in the validation subset. On final pathology 49.2% of low risk patients had disease up staged.
CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year disease specific survival of low risk patients was greater than 80%, supporting the distinction of high risk and low risk muscle invasive bladder cancer. The presence of high risk features identifies patients with a poor prognosis who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while many of those with low risk disease can undergo surgery up front with good expectations and avoid chemotherapy associated toxicity.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D; 3-dimensional; BC; CSM; DSS; EUA; HR; LR; LVI; MDACC; MIBC; NAC; OS; PFS; RC; TUR; USC; University of Southern California; University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; VH; bladder cancer; cause specific mortality; cystectomy; disease specific survival; examination under anesthesia; high risk; low risk; lymphovascular invasion; muscle invasive bladder cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant therapy; outcomes assessment; overall survival; progression-free survival; radical cystectomy; risk; transurethral resection; urinary bladder neoplasms; variant histology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911605      PMCID: PMC4158919          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Ganesh S Palapattu; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Craig G Rogers; Amnon Vazina; Patrick J Bastian; Mark P Schoenberg; Seth P Lerner; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: results of a surgery only series in the neobladder era.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Robert C de Petriconi; Martina Kron; Bjoern G Volkmer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The effects of stage divergence on survival after radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; David C Miller; Rodney L Dunn; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Clinical outcomes following radical cystectomy for primary nontransitional cell carcinoma of the bladder compared to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Ganesh S Palapattu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Patrick J Bastian; Yair Lotan; Amit Gupta; Amnon Vazina; Amiel Gilad; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Seth P Lerner; Mark P Schoenberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of the clinical and pathologic staging in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sean McLaughlin; Jon Shephard; Eric Wallen; Susan Maygarden; Culley C Carson; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  The significance of lymphovascular invasion in transurethral resection of bladder tumour and cystectomy specimens on the survival of patients with urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper; Christopher M Simons; Badrinath R Konety; DeSirae M Muirhead; Richard D Williams; Michael A O'Donnell; Fadi N Joudi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The presence of lymphovascular invasion in radical cystectomy specimens from patients with urothelial carcinoma portends a poor clinical prognosis.

Authors:  Daniel Canter; Thomas Guzzo; Matthew Resnick; Laurie Magerfleisch; Seema Sonnad; Meredith Bergey; John Tomazewski; David Vaughn; Keith Van Arsdalen; Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in small cell urothelial cancer improves pathologic downstaging and long-term outcomes: results from a retrospective study at the MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Authors:  Siobhan P Lynch; Yu Shen; Ashish Kamat; H Barton Grossman; Jay B Shah; Randall E Millikan; Colin P Dinney; Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant alternating doublet chemotherapy with ifosfamide/doxorubicin and etoposide/cisplatin in small-cell urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Ashish M Kamat; H Barton Grossman; Dallas L Williams; Wei Qiao; Peter F Thall; Colin P Dinney; Randall E Millikan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Micropapillary bladder cancer: a review of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Colin P N Dinney; Jason R Gee; H Barton Grossman; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Pheroze Tamboli; Michelle A Detry; Tracy L Robinson; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  The prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Ilaria Lucca; Morgan Rouprêt; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Bladder Preservation Therapy: Review of Literature and Future Directions of Trimodal Therapy.

Authors:  Adnan El-Achkar; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Bladder cancer: Gaps in staging and care identified.

Authors:  Mina Razzak
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  [Molecular tumor board-urothelial cancer].

Authors:  M C Hupe; G Gakis; R Seiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The risk of oversimplification in risk-stratification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-responses in muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Amir Sherif
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

6.  Should every patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  Moritz Maas; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

7.  Should we spare neoadjuvant chemotherapy in low-risk muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients scheduled for radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Günter Niegisch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

8.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Peter C Black; Srikala S Sridhar; Anil Kapoor; Alexandre R Zlotta; Bobby Shayegan; Ricardo A Rendon; Peter Chung; Theodorus van der Kwast; Nimira Alimohamed; Yves Fradet; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  The impact of completeness of last transurethral resection of bladder tumors on the outcomes of radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Stefania Zamboni; Marco Moschini; Andrea Gallina; Renzo Colombo; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Alessandro Antonelli; Claudio Simeone; Sandra Belotti; Luca Cristinelli; Agostino Mattei; Philipp Baumeister
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Overall survival in patients with residual disease after radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Amirali Salmasi; Neil Mendhiratta; Andrew T Lenis; Aydin Pooli; Alexandra Drakaki; Kiran Gollapudi; Jeremy Blumberg; Allan J Pantuck; Karim Chamie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.