Literature DB >> 16793197

Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Ganesh S Palapattu, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Craig G Rogers, Amnon Vazina, Patrick J Bastian, Mark P Schoenberg, Seth P Lerner, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Yair Lotan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We compared clinical and pathologic staging in a large, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who were treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and determined the effect of stage discrepancy on outcomes.
METHODS: We collected retrospective data from 778 consecutive patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma who were treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and for whom the clinical and pathologic stage were available.
RESULTS: Pathologic upstaging occurred in 42% of patients, and pathologic downstaging occurred in 22%. Forty percent of patients with non-muscle-invasive clinical stage had muscle-invasive pathologic stage. Thirty-six percent of patients with organ-confined clinical stage had non-organ-confined pathologic stage (> or =pT3N0 or pTanyN-positive). Patients with higher clinical stage were more likely to be upstaged to non-organ-confined disease (p<0.001). Patients were stratified into three groups: pathologically upstaged, same clinical and pathologic stage, and pathologically downstaged. When adjusted for the effects of standard postoperative features, upstaged patients were at a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence and bladder cancer-specific death than patients who had the same pathologic and clinical stage, who in turn were at significantly higher risk than downstaged patients. This observation remained true within each clinical stage strata. Within each pathologic stage strata, clinical stage did not substratify into different risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical to pathologic stage discrepancy is a relatively common finding after extirpative surgery for bladder cancer. Clinical outcomes after radical cystectomy are largely driven by pathologic stage. Better clinical staging is necessary to improve patient evaluation and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793197     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  78 in total

1.  The role of radical cystectomy in patients with clinical T4b bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Black; Colin P N Dinney; Gordon A Brown; Wassim Kassouf; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Mark F Munsell; H Barton Grossman; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  [Patients with bladder cancer in clinical stage T2 : survival benefit of downstaging in comparison to patients with confirmed muscle invasion in cystectomy specimens].

Authors:  M May; H-M Fritsche; S Brookman-May; M Burger; C Bolenz; L Trojan; E Herrmann; M S Michel; C Wülfing; A Tiemann; S C Müller; J Ellinger; A Buchner; C G Stief; D Tilki; W F Wieland; C Gilfrich; T Höfner; M Hohenfellner; A Haferkamp; J Roigas; M Zacharias; S Gunia; P J Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  The prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Ilaria Lucca; Morgan Rouprêt; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Preoperative imaging for staging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maxim J McKibben; Michael E Woods
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Selecting patients for immediate cystectomy.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 7.  [When should systemic chemotherapy be used for urinary bladder carcinoma?].

Authors:  C-H Ohlmann; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Prognostic impact of comorbidity in patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ifeanyichukwu I Megwalu; Anna Vlahiotis; Mohamed Radwan; Jay F Piccirillo; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Application of new technology in bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.