PURPOSE: Currently, treatment recommendations for small-cell urothelial cancer (SCUC) are based on anecdotal case reports and small retrospective series. We now report results from the first phase II clinical trial developed exclusively for SCUC, to our knowledge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2006, 30 patients with SCUC provided consent and were treated with alternating doublet chemotherapy. Patients with surgically resectable disease (< or = cT4aN0M0) received a total of four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with unresectable disease (> or = cT4b, N+, or M+) received two cycles beyond maximal response. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with surgically resectable SCUC received neoadjuvant treatment with a median overall survival (OS) of 58 months; 13 of these patients remain alive and cancer free. For patients with cT2N0M0 SCUC, the 5-year OS rate is 80%; only one of four patients with cT3b-4aN0M0 remains alive (median OS, 37.8 months). For 12 patients with unresectable or metastatic SCUC, the median OS was 13.3 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with transfusion, neutropenic fever, and infection remaining the most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities. There was only one postsurgical death. Brain metastases were strongly associated with more advanced-stage disease, developing in eight of 16 patients with either bulky tumors (> or = cT3b) or metastatic disease (P = .004). CONCLUSION: These clinical trial results are consistent with previously reported retrospective data demonstrating long-term survival with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resectable SCUC. Once metastases develop, the prognosis remains poor. The strong positive association between disease stage and brain metastases highlights a patient subset that may potentially benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation.
PURPOSE: Currently, treatment recommendations for small-cell urothelial cancer (SCUC) are based on anecdotal case reports and small retrospective series. We now report results from the first phase II clinical trial developed exclusively for SCUC, to our knowledge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2006, 30 patients with SCUC provided consent and were treated with alternating doublet chemotherapy. Patients with surgically resectable disease (< or = cT4aN0M0) received a total of four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with unresectable disease (> or = cT4b, N+, or M+) received two cycles beyond maximal response. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with surgically resectable SCUC received neoadjuvant treatment with a median overall survival (OS) of 58 months; 13 of these patients remain alive and cancer free. For patients with cT2N0M0 SCUC, the 5-year OS rate is 80%; only one of four patients with cT3b-4aN0M0 remains alive (median OS, 37.8 months). For 12 patients with unresectable or metastatic SCUC, the median OS was 13.3 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with transfusion, neutropenic fever, and infection remaining the most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities. There was only one postsurgical death. Brain metastases were strongly associated with more advanced-stage disease, developing in eight of 16 patients with either bulky tumors (> or = cT3b) or metastatic disease (P = .004). CONCLUSION: These clinical trial results are consistent with previously reported retrospective data demonstrating long-term survival with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resectable SCUC. Once metastases develop, the prognosis remains poor. The strong positive association between disease stage and brain metastases highlights a patient subset that may potentially benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation.
Authors: R Bastús; J M Caballero; G González; P Borrat; J Casalots; G Gomez de Segura; L I Martí; J Ristol; L Cirera Journal: Eur Urol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Marcus L Quek; Peter W Nichols; Jonathan Yamzon; Siamak Daneshmand; Gus Miranda; Jie Cai; Susan Groshen; John P Stein; Donald G Skinner Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Liang Cheng; Chong-Xian Pan; Ximing J Yang; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Gregory T MacLennan; Haiqun Lin; Timothy M Kuzel; Veronica Papavero; Maria Tretiakova; Kelly Nigro; Michael O Koch; John N Eble Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Colin P Dinney; Neil A Abrahams; Cesar Moran; Yu Shen; Louis L Pisters; H Barton Grossman; David A Swanson; Randall E Millikan Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew T Chang; Alexander Penson; Neil B Desai; Nicholas D Socci; Ronglai Shen; Venkatraman E Seshan; Ritika Kundra; Adam Abeshouse; Agnes Viale; Eugene K Cha; Xueli Hao; Victor E Reuter; Charles M Rudin; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Dean F Bajorin; Nikolaus Schultz; Michael F Berger; Gopa Iyer; David B Solit; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Barry S Taylor Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Patricia Moretto; Lori Wood; Urban Emmenegger; Normand Blais; Som Dave Mukherjee; Eric Winquist; Eric Charles Belanger; Robert Macrae; Alexander Balogh; Ilias Cagiannos; Wassim Kassouf; Peter Black; Piotr Czaykowski; Joel Gingerich; Scott North; Scott Ernst; Suzanne Richter; Srikala Sridhar; M Neil Reaume; Denis Soulieres; Andrea Eisen; Christina M Canil Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Rick Bangs; Stephen A Boorjian; Mark K Buyyounouski; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas W Flaig; Terence Friedlander; Richard E Greenberg; Khurshid A Guru; Noah Hahn; Harry W Herr; Christopher Hoimes; Brant A Inman; A Karim Kader; Adam S Kibel; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff Michalski; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lance C Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Daniel Petrylak; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Wade J Sexton; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Guru Sonpavde; Jonathan Tward; Geoffrey Wile; Mary A Dwyer; Courtney Smith Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Farshid Dayyani; Bogdan A Czerniak; Kanishka Sircar; Mark F Munsell; Randall E Millikan; Colin P Dinney; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 7.450