Literature DB >> 23911178

Evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system with automatic high- and low-pattern recognition software in insulin-using patients: pattern detection and patient-reported insights.

Mike Grady1, Denise Campbell, Kirsty MacLeod, Aparna Srinivasan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a glucose pattern recognition tool incorporated in a blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) and its association with clinical measures, and to assess user perception and understanding of the pattern messages they receive.
METHODS: Participants had type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and were self-adjusting insulin doses for ≥1 year. During a 4-week home testing period, participants performed ≥6 daily self-tests, adjusted their insulin regimen based on BGMS results, and recorded pattern messages in the logbook. Participants reflected on usability of the pattern tool in a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Study participants (n = 101) received a mean ± standard deviation of 4.5 ± 1.9 pattern messages per week (3.6 ± 1.8 high glucose patterns and 0.9 ± 1.3 low glucose patterns). Most received ≥1 high (96.5%) and/or ≥1 low (46.0%) pattern message per week. The average number of high- and low-pattern messages per week was associated with higher and lower, respectively, baseline hemoglobin A1c (p < .01) and fasting plasma glucose (p < .05). Participants found high- and low-pattern messages clear and easy to understand (84.2% and 83.2%, respectively) and considered the frequency of low (82.0%) and high (63.4%) pattern messages about right. Overall, 71.3% of participants indicated they preferred to use a meter with pattern messages.
CONCLUSIONS: The on-device Pattern tool identified meaningful blood glucose patterns, highlighting potential opportunities for improving glycemic control in patients who self-adjust their insulin.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911178      PMCID: PMC3879761          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  13 in total

Review 1.  Assessing glycemic control with self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A(1c) measurements.

Authors:  George Dailey
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Value of self-monitoring blood glucose pattern analysis in improving diabetes outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Jaime A Davidson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

3.  Slicing the pie. Correlating HbA--values with average blood glucose values in a pie chart form.

Authors:  K W Brewer; H P Chase; S Owen; S K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Automated glycemic pattern analysis can improve health care professional efficiency and accuracy.

Authors:  Laurence B Katz; Riad G Dirani; Gang Li; Randee A Randoll; John J Mahoney
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

5.  A structured self-monitoring of blood glucose approach in type 2 diabetes encourages more frequent, intensive, and effective physician interventions: results from the STeP study.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Charles H Schikman; Deborah A Hinnen; Christopher G Parkin; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Matthias Axel-Schweitzer; Bettina Petersen; Robin S Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Glycaemic control and severe hypoglycaemia following training in flexible, intensive insulin therapy to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: a prospective implementation study.

Authors:  A Sämann; I Mühlhauser; R Bender; Ch Kloos; U A Müller
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-05

8.  Prediction of severe hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Daniel J Cox; Linda Gonder-Frederick; Lee Ritterband; William Clarke; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Charles H Schikman; Deborah A Hinnen; Christopher G Parkin; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Bettina Petersen; Matthias Schweitzer; Robin S Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Effect of automated bio-behavioral feedback on the control of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Pamela Mendosa; Stacey Anderson; Jeffrey S Hawley; Lee M Ritterband; Linda Gonder-Frederick
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  7 in total

1.  Usability Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System With a Spill-Resistant Vial, Easier Strip Handling, and Connectivity to a Mobile App: Improvement of Patient Convenience and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Craig Harvey; Richard Koubek; Vanessa Bégat; Stephan Jacob
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-22

2.  Use of Blood Glucose Meters Featuring Color Range Indicators Improves Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes in Comparison to Blood Glucose Meters Without Color (ACCENTS Study).

Authors:  Mike Grady; Laurence B Katz; Brian L Levy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-31

3.  Remote Health Consultations Supported by a Diabetes Management Web Application With a New Glucose Meter Demonstrates Improved Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Mike Grady; Hilary Cameron; Brian L Levy; Laurence B Katz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03

4.  Use of an Integrated Tool for Interpretation of Blood Glucose Data Improves Correctness of Glycemic Risk Assessment in Individuals With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Stephanie Schwenke; Anna Katharina Ossege; Torsten Gruchmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-25

5.  Evaluation of the utility of a glycemic pattern identification system.

Authors:  Erik A Otto; Vinay Tannan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-12

6.  Penny wise and pound foolish: will shortsighted cost reduction measures compromise patient access to promising self-monitoring of blood glucose technology?

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

7.  Evaluation of a New Digital Automated Glycemic Pattern Detection Tool.

Authors:  María José Comellas; Emma Albiñana; Maite Artes; Rosa Corcoy; Diego Fernández-García; Jorge García-Alemán; Beatriz García-Cuartero; Cintia González; María Teresa Rivero; Núria Casamira; Jörg Weissmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.