Literature DB >> 27390222

Usability Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System With a Spill-Resistant Vial, Easier Strip Handling, and Connectivity to a Mobile App: Improvement of Patient Convenience and Satisfaction.

Craig Harvey1, Richard Koubek2, Vanessa Bégat3, Stephan Jacob4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proper management of diabetes mellitus requires regular self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This research evaluated the usability of the Accu-Chek® Guide Meter that includes a spill-resistant vial, easier strip handling, and wireless connectivity to a mobile app.
METHODS: A total of 197 participants were allowed to experience typical blood glucose testing tasks on the Accu-Chek Guide Meter, review data such as last result, patterns, and target percentage on the meter and on the mobile app, and then evaluate their experience through a human factors usability survey. Participants used a 6-point agree/disagree scale to rate 34 market statement questions.
RESULTS: The results of a Pearson chi-square proportions test for each of the 34 market statement questions showed a significant difference (P < .0001) between the disagree responses (1-3) and agree responses (4-6). An overwhelming majority of participants found all aspects of the system, including the test strips, strip vial, and data analysis on the meter and the mobile app, to be a good fit for their lifestyle and to provide a better testing experience.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found superior usability of the new meter system over the participants' current meters in both the United States and France.
© 2016 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SMBG; blood glucose monitoring system; diabetes; human factors; mobile app; usability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390222      PMCID: PMC5032967          DOI: 10.1177/1932296816658058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  13 in total

1.  Introduction to human factors.

Authors:  Eric Bergman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  The quality of self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  R Colagiuri; S Colagiuri; S Jones; R G Moses
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  7 Themes for guiding situated ergonomic assessments of medical devices: a case study of an inpatient glucometer.

Authors:  Dominic Furniss; Paolo Masci; Paul Curzon; Astrid Mayer; Ann Blandford
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  An evaluation of diabetes self-management applications for Android smartphones.

Authors:  Andrew P Demidowich; Kevin Lu; Ronald Tamler; Zachary Bloomgarden
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 6.184

6.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2010.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Christina M Parrinello; David B Sacks; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Evidence linking hypoglycemic events to an increased risk of acute cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Christopher Conner; Mark Aagren; David M Smith; Jonathan Bouchard; Jason Brett
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Barriers and facilitators to self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Woon May Ong; Siew Siang Chua; Chirk Jenn Ng
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer diagnosis: looking into the future.

Authors:  Muhammad Javed Iqbal; Zeeshan Javed; Haleema Sadia; Ijaz A Qureshi; Asma Irshad; Rais Ahmed; Kausar Malik; Shahid Raza; Asif Abbas; Raffaele Pezzani; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  Artificial intelligence in the management and treatment of burns: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Serra E Moura; Kavit Amin; Chidi Ekwobi
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Promises and Perils.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Guy Rosman; Daniela Rus; Ozanan R Meireles
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  One Drop | Mobile on iPhone and Apple Watch: An Evaluation of HbA1c Improvement Associated With Tracking Self-Care.

Authors:  Chandra Y Osborn; Joost R van Ginkel; David G Marrero; David Rodbard; Brian Huddleston; Jeff Dachis
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Improved Glycemic Control in a Patient Group Performing 7-Point Profile Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Intensive Data Documentation: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Observational Study.

Authors:  Jochen Sieber; Frank Flacke; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.945

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.