Literature DB >> 23911166

Prevalence of bacterial contamination of glucose test strips in individual single-use packets versus multiple-use vials.

Millán Pérez-Ayala1, Paloma Oliver, Fernando Rodríguez Cantalejo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucose measurement is the cornerstone of diabetes control. In the hospital setting, the same device and package of test strips (50 or 100 strips) can be used to monitor glucose in several patients, which can increase cross contamination. The objective of our study is to measure bacterial contamination in glucose test strips, comparing results in individual single-use packets (one hospital) versus multi-use vials (two hospitals) in Spain.
METHODS: Test strips were collected from five different wards. Each hospital also collected two unopened vials from a single ward as controls. They were sent to a reference laboratory for microbiologic study. A number equal or higher than two colony forming units per strip was considered as a positive result.
RESULTS: Out of 423 glucose test strips collected and cultured, 146 were contaminated (34%); only 7% of individually packed strips were contaminated versus 45% of strips packed in multi-use vials, with a high statistical significance (p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the strips from multi-use vials, a high contamination rate was found and highly pathogenic organisms were identified, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus hemolyticus. In contrast, in strips packed individually, there was a much lower contamination rate and no such pathogen organisms were found. Therefore, in the hospital setting, the use of blood glucose test strips in individual packages would be more advantageous (mainly from a clinical point of view, but also from a financial one) than those packed in multi-use vials.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911166      PMCID: PMC3879749          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  32 in total

Review 1.  MRSA and MRSE: is there an answer?

Authors:  C Carbon
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Infection control - a problem for patient safety.

Authors:  John P Burke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [Medico-economic analysis of nosocomial infections].

Authors:  S Charvet-Protat
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2000-10-28       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Bedside blood glucose monitoring in hospitals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Use of audit tools to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning systems in hospitals.

Authors:  Rifhat E Malik; Rose A Cooper; Chris J Griffith
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Hepatitis C in a ward for cystic fibrosis and diabetic patients: possible transmission by spring-loaded finger-stick devices for self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose.

Authors:  J C Desenclos; M Bourdiol-Razès; B Rolin; P Garandeau; J Ducos; C Bréchot; V Thiers
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Commercial tattooing as a potentially important source of hepatitis C infection. Clinical epidemiology of 626 consecutive patients unaware of their hepatitis C serologic status.

Authors:  R W Haley; R P Fischer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Microbiological and molecular characterization of human clinical isolates of Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus sciuri.

Authors:  Elvira Garza-González; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Manuel A Martínez-Vázquez; Esteban Gonzalez-Diaz; Omar González-Santiago; Eduardo Rodríguez-Noriega
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-19

9.  Nosocomial spread of a Staphylococcus capitis strain with heteroresistance to vancomycin in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Wil C Van Der Zwet; Yvette J Debets-Ossenkopp; Erik Reinders; Maria Kapi; Paul H M Savelkoul; Ruurd M Van Elburg; Keiichi Hiramatsu; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  How do we assess hospital cleaning? A proposal for microbiological standards for surface hygiene in hospitals.

Authors:  S J Dancer
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine.

Authors:  Alessio Mancini; Giampaolo Esposto; Silvana Manfrini; Silvia Rilli; Gessica Tinti; Giuseppe Carta; Laura Petrolati; Matteo Vidali; Simone Barocci
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 2.  Point-of-care blood glucose testing for diabetes care in hospitalized patients: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Rajesh Rajendran; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 3.  Disruption in the diabetic device care market.

Authors:  Utkarsh Ojha; Raihan Mohammed
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-02-02

4.  Assessment of Epidemiological Safety in the Cosmetic Service Industry in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska; Izabela Kucharska; Agnieszka Segiet-Święcicka; Marcin Kuczerowski; Robert Gajda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The bacterial contamination rate of glucose meter test strips in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Khalid A Al-Rubeaan; Amr T M Saeb; Dhekra M AlNaqeb; Hamid M AlQumaidi; Turki A AlMogbel
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Infection Transmission Associated with Point of Care Testing and the Laboratory's Role in Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Sharon M Geaghan
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-09-04

7.  Assessing Infection Risks among Clients and Staff Who Use Tattooing Services in Poland: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska; Izabela Kucharska; Agnieszka Segiet-Swiecicka; Marcin Kuczerowski; Robert Gajda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.