Literature DB >> 23909817

Selectively bred crossed high-alcohol-preferring mice drink to intoxication and develop functional tolerance, but not locomotor sensitization during free-choice ethanol access.

Liana M Matson1, Chelsea R Kasten, Stephen L Boehm, Nicholas J Grahame.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Crossed high-alcohol-preferring (cHAP) mice were selectively bred from a cross of the HAP1 × HAP2 replicate lines and demonstrate blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) during free-choice drinking reminiscent of those observed in alcohol-dependent humans. In this report, we investigated the relationship between free-choice drinking, intoxication, tolerance, and sensitization in cHAP mice. We hypothesized that initially mice would become ataxic after drinking alcohol, but that increased drinking over days would be accompanied by increasing tolerance to the ataxic effects of ethanol (EtOH).
METHODS: Male and female cHAP mice had free-choice access to 10% EtOH and water (E), while Water mice (W) had access to water alone. In experiment 1, the first drinking experience was monitored during the dark portion of the cycle. Once E mice reached an average intake rate of ≥1.5 g/kg/h, they, along with W mice, were tested for footslips on a balance beam, and BECs were assessed. In experiments 2, 3, and 4, after varying durations of free-choice 10% EtOH access (0, 3, 14, or 21 days), mice were challenged with 20% EtOH and tested for number of footslips on a balance beam or locomotor stimulant response. Blood was sampled for BEC determination.
RESULTS: We found that cHAP mice rapidly acquire alcohol intakes that lead to ataxia. Over time, cHAP mice developed behavioral tolerance to the ataxic effects of alcohol, paralleled by escalating alcohol consumption. However, locomotor sensitization did not develop following 14 days of free-choice EtOH access.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we observed increases in free-choice drinking with extended alcohol access paralleled by increases in functional tolerance, but not locomotor sensitization. These data support our hypothesis that escalating free-choice drinking over days in cHAP mice is driven by tolerance to alcohol's behavioral effects. These data are the first to demonstrate that escalating free-choice consumption is accompanied by increasing alcohol tolerance. In addition to buttressing the hypothesized importance of tolerance in drinking, our findings suggest that cHAP mice may be a unique, translational resource for studying tolerance as a contributor to and consequence of chronic, excessive EtOH consumption.
Copyright © 2013 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol Consumption; Motor Ataxia; Rodent Model; Selected Line; Tolerance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23909817      PMCID: PMC3844084          DOI: 10.1111/acer.12216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  28 in total

1.  Pharmacologically relevant intake during chronic, free-choice drinking rhythms in selectively bred high alcohol-preferring mice.

Authors:  Liana M Matson; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Chronic tolerance and sensitization to alcohol in sons of alcoholics.

Authors:  D B Newlin; J B Thomson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Homeostatic theory of drug tolerance: a general model of physiological adaptation.

Authors:  C X Poulos; H Cappell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Experimentally induced intoxication in alcoholics: a comparison between programed and spontaneous drinking.

Authors:  N K Mello; J H Mendelson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Tolerance and the etiology of alcoholism: hypothesis and mechanism.

Authors:  B Tabakoff; P L Hoffman
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Genotypic differences in ethanol sensitivity in two tests of motor incoordination.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Chia-Hua Yu; Jason P Schlumbohm; Andy J Cameron; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-04-18

7.  Ethanol locomotor sensitization, but not tolerance correlates with selection for alcohol preference in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice.

Authors:  N J Grahame; K Rodd-Henricks; T K Li; L Lumeng
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Tolerance and sensitization to the hypnotic effects of alcohol induced by chronic voluntary alcohol intake in rats.

Authors:  Sònia Darbra; Gemma Prat; Marc Pallarés; Nuria Ferré
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.153

9.  The development of metabolic tolerance in the alcohol-preferring P rats: comparison of forced and free-choice drinking of ethanol.

Authors:  L Lumeng; T K Li
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Different sensitivities to ethanol in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats.

Authors:  L Lumeng; M B Waller; W J McBride; T K Li
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effects of Chronic Voluntary Alcohol Drinking on Thiamine Concentrations, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, and Oxidative Stress in the Brain of Crossed High Alcohol Preferring Mice.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Dexiang Liu; Jing Chen; Hui Li; Mei Xu; Wen Wen; Jacqueline A Frank; Nicholas J Grahame; Haining Zhu; Jia Luo
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 2.  Adaptations underlying the development of excessive alcohol intake in selectively bred mice.

Authors:  Tod E Kippin
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Effects of Pharmacologically Targeting Neuroimmune Pathways on Alcohol Drinking in Mice Selectively Bred to Drink to Intoxication.

Authors:  Angela R Ozburn; Pamela Metten; Sheena Potretzke; Kayla G Townsley; Yuri A Blednov; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel Subunit 3 Knock-Out Mice Show Enhanced Ethanol Reward.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Jonathan D Raybuck; Laura B Kozell; K Matthew Lattal; Kari J Buck
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  The effect of prior alcohol consumption on the ataxic response to alcohol in high-alcohol preferring mice.

Authors:  Brandon M Fritz; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.405

6.  Chronic alcohol self-administration in monkeys shows long-term quantity/frequency categorical stability.

Authors:  Erich J Baker; Jonathan Farro; Steven Gonzales; Christa Helms; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Andrea C King; Deborah Hasin; Sean J O'Connor; Patrick J McNamara; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  A DNA element in the slo gene modulates ethanol tolerance.

Authors:  Harish R Krishnan; Xiaolei Li; Alfredo Ghezzi; Nigel S Atkinson
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Attentional set shifting in HAP3, LAP3, and cHAP mice is unaffected by either genetic differences in alcohol preference or an alcohol drinking history.

Authors:  Lauren A Millie; Stephen L Boehm; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Long-Term Alcohol Drinking Reduces the Efficacy of Forced Abstinence and Conditioned Taste Aversion in Crossed High-Alcohol-Preferring Mice.

Authors:  David S O'Tousa; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.