BACKGROUND: G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels contribute to the effects of a number of drugs of abuse, including ethanol. However, the roles of individual subunits in the rewarding effects of ethanol are poorly understood. METHODS: We compare conditioned place preference (CPP) in GIRK3 subunit knock-out (GIRK3(-/-)), heterozygote (GIRK3(+/-)), and wild-type (WT) mice. In addition, the development of locomotor tolerance/sensitization and the effects of EtOH intoxication on associative learning (fear conditioning) are also assessed. RESULTS: Our data show significant EtOH CPP in GIRK3(-/-) and GIRK3(+/-) mice, but not in the WT littermates. In addition, we demonstrate that these effects are not due to differences in EtOH metabolism, the development of EtOH tolerance/sensitivity, or associative learning abilities. While there were no consistent genotype differences in the fear conditioning assay, our data do show a selective sensitization of the impairing effects of EtOH intoxication on contextual learning, but no effect on cued learning. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that GIRK3 plays a role in EtOH reward. Furthermore, the selectivity of this effect suggests that GIRK channels could be an effective therapeutic target for the prevention and/or treatment of alcoholism.
BACKGROUND: G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels contribute to the effects of a number of drugs of abuse, including ethanol. However, the roles of individual subunits in the rewarding effects of ethanol are poorly understood. METHODS: We compare conditioned place preference (CPP) in GIRK3 subunit knock-out (GIRK3(-/-)), heterozygote (GIRK3(+/-)), and wild-type (WT) mice. In addition, the development of locomotor tolerance/sensitization and the effects of EtOH intoxication on associative learning (fear conditioning) are also assessed. RESULTS: Our data show significant EtOH CPP in GIRK3(-/-) and GIRK3(+/-) mice, but not in the WT littermates. In addition, we demonstrate that these effects are not due to differences in EtOH metabolism, the development of EtOH tolerance/sensitivity, or associative learning abilities. While there were no consistent genotype differences in the fear conditioning assay, our data do show a selective sensitization of the impairing effects of EtOH intoxication on contextual learning, but no effect on cued learning. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that GIRK3 plays a role in EtOH reward. Furthermore, the selectivity of this effect suggests that GIRK channels could be an effective therapeutic target for the prevention and/or treatment of alcoholism.
Authors: Katherine G Hill; Herminia Alva; Yuri A Blednov; Christopher L Cunningham Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-04-30 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jennifer A Rinker; Diana B Fulmer; Heather Trantham-Davidson; Maren L Smith; Robert W Williams; Marcelo F Lopez; Patrick K Randall; L Judson Chandler; Michael F Miles; Howard C Becker; Patrick J Mulholland Journal: Alcohol Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Shaunna L Clark; Blair N Costin; Robin F Chan; Alexander W Johnson; Linying Xie; Jessica L Jurmain; Gaurav Kumar; Andrey A Shabalin; Ashutosh K Pandey; Karolina A Aberg; Michael F Miles; Edwin van den Oord Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-11-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sandra Sanchez-Roige; Pierre Fontanillas; Sarah L Elson; Joshua C Gray; Harriet de Wit; Lea K Davis; James MacKillop; Abraham A Palmer Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 4.280