Literature DB >> 10972472

Ethanol locomotor sensitization, but not tolerance correlates with selection for alcohol preference in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice.

N J Grahame1, K Rodd-Henricks, T K Li, L Lumeng.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Some theories have advanced a role for both locomotor sensitization and tolerance in the reinforcing properties of drugs. The present studies used selected lines of mice to assess genetic correlations among ethanol drinking, ethanol locomotor sensitization, and tolerance to the depressant effects of ethanol.
OBJECTIVES: Ethanol-naive high- and low-alcohol preferring (HAP and LAP) selected lines of mice were tested for locomotor sensitization to ethanol and acquisition of acute functional tolerance to ethanol using the static dowel test.
METHODS: For the locomotor sensitization study, mice received four i.p. injections of one of five doses of ethanol (0-3.5 g/kg) at 48-h intervals. On the sensitization test day, 48 h after the last drug administration day, all mice received a 2.0-g/kg ethanol injection. Other mice from the same lines were subjected to a two-injection (3.75 g/kg total), acute functional tolerance procedure assessing disruption of balance on a static dowel.
RESULTS: Lines differed neither in the acute locomotor activating nor depressant effects of ethanol. Additionally, neither line's response to the depressant effect of 3.5 g/kg ethanol changed with repeated injection. However, locomotor sensitization was seen in HAP but not LAP mice that had received 2.75 g/kg or 3.5 g/kg ethanol during repeated administration. Both HAP and LAP mice acquired equivalent acute functional tolerance, as measured by an increase in blood ethanol concentration between the first and second recovery measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings imply that high ethanol consumption in mice appears to be genetically related to ethanol locomotor sensitization. Additionally, ethanol locomotor sensitization does not appear to be related to tolerance to the depressant effects of ethanol. These findings support a role for sensitization in high alcohol-seeking behavior in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10972472     DOI: 10.1007/s002130000388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  30 in total

1.  Relative fluid novelty differentially alters the time course of limited-access ethanol and water intake in selectively bred high-alcohol-preferring mice.

Authors:  David N Linsenbardt; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  The genetic relationships between ethanol preference, acute ethanol sensitivity, and ethanol tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anita V Devineni; Kimberly D McClure; Douglas J Guarnieri; Ammon B Corl; Fred W Wolf; Mark Eddison; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.160

3.  Intragastric self-infusion of ethanol in high- and low-drinking mouse genotypes after passive ethanol exposure.

Authors:  T L Fidler; A M Dion; M S Powers; J J Ramirez; J A Mulgrew; P J Smitasin; A T Crane; C L Cunningham
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Involvement of protein kinase A in ethanol-induced locomotor activity and sensitization.

Authors:  J R Fee; D J Knapp; D R Sparta; G R Breese; M J Picker; T E Thiele
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Behavioral sensitization to ethanol does not result in cross-sensitization to NMDA receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Human and laboratory rodent low response to alcohol: is better consilience possible?

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Richard L Bell; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.280

7.  Locomotor sensitization to ethanol impairs NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens and increases ethanol self-administration.

Authors:  Karina Possa Abrahao; Olusegun J Ariwodola; Tracy R Butler; Andrew R Rau; Mary Jane Skelly; Eugenia Carter; Nancy P Alexander; Brian A McCool; Maria Lucia O Souza-Formigoni; Jeffrey L Weiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of stress, acute alcohol treatment, or both on pre-pulse inhibition in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice.

Authors:  M S Powers; J A Chester
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Effects of alcohol on the acquisition and expression of fear-potentiated startle in mouse lines selectively bred for high and low alcohol preference.

Authors:  Gustavo D Barrenha; Laran E Coon; Julia A Chester
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Behavioral differences between C57BL/6J x FVB/NJ and C57BL/6J x NZB/B1NJ F1 hybrid mice: relation to control of ethanol intake.

Authors:  A R Ozburn; R A Harris; Y A Blednov
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.