Literature DB >> 23908557

Robust Analysis of High Throughput Screening (HTS) Assay Data.

Changwon Lim1, Pranab K Sen, Shyamal D Peddada.   

Abstract

Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) assays use cells or tissues to screen thousands of compounds in a short period of time. Data generated from qHTS assays are then evaluated using nonlinear regression models, such as the Hill model, and decisions regarding toxicity are made using the estimates of the parameters of the model. For any given compound, the variability in the observed response may either be constant across dose groups (homoscedasticity) or vary with dose (heteroscedasticity). Since thousands of compounds are simultaneously evaluated in a qHTS assay, it is not practically feasible for an investigator to perform residual analysis to determine the variance structure before performing statistical inferences on each compound. Since it is well-known that the variance structure plays an important role in the analysis of linear and nonlinear regression models it is therefore important to have practically useful and easy to interpret methodology which is robust to the variance structure. Furthermore, given the number of chemicals that are investigated in the qHTS assay, outliers and influential observations are not uncommon. In this article we describe preliminary test estimation (PTE) based methodology which is robust to the variance structure as well as any potential outliers and influential observations. Performance of the proposed methodology is evaluated in terms of false discovery rate (FDR) and power using a simulation study mimicking a real qHTS data. Of the two methods currently in use, our simulations studies suggest that one is extremely conservative with very small power in comparison to the proposed PTE based method whereas the other method is very liberal. In contrast, the proposed PTE based methodology achieves a better control of FDR while maintaining good power. The proposed methodology is illustrated using a data set obtained from the National Toxicology Program (NTP). Additional information, simulation results, data and computer code are available online as supplementary materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-response study; False discovery rate (FDR); Heteroscedasticity; Hill model; M-estimation procedure; Nonlinear regression model; Power; Toxicology

Year:  2013        PMID: 23908557      PMCID: PMC3727440          DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2012.749166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technometrics        ISSN: 0040-1706


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries.

Authors:  James Inglese; Douglas S Auld; Ajit Jadhav; Ronald L Johnson; Anton Simeonov; Adam Yasgar; Wei Zheng; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A new method with flexible and balanced control of false negatives and false positives for hit selection in RNA interference high-throughput screening assays.

Authors:  Xiaohua Douglas Zhang
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2007-05-21

3.  Dose-response modeling of high-throughput screening data.

Authors:  Fred Parham; Chris Austin; Noel Southall; Ruili Huang; Raymond Tice; Christopher Portier
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2009-12

4.  Accounting for Uncertainty in Heteroscedasticity in Nonlinear Regression.

Authors:  Changwon Lim; Pranab K Sen; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 1.111

Review 5.  A robotic platform for quantitative high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Sam Michael; Douglas Auld; Carleen Klumpp; Ajit Jadhav; Wei Zheng; Natasha Thorne; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese; Anton Simeonov
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.738

6.  Compound cytotoxicity profiling using quantitative high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Kristine L Witt; Noel Southall; Jennifer Fostel; Ming-Hsuang Cho; Ajit Jadhav; Cynthia S Smith; James Inglese; Christopher J Portier; Raymond R Tice; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Robust nonlinear regression in applications.

Authors:  Changwon Lim; Pranab K Sen; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  J Indian Soc Agric Stat       Date:  2013

2.  Using weighted entropy to rank chemicals in quantitative high-throughput screening experiments.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2013-09-20

3.  Quantitative high-throughput screening data analysis: challenges and recent advances.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Testing for inequality constraints in singular models by trimming or winsorizing the variance matrix.

Authors:  Ori Davidov; Casey M Jelsema; Shyamal Peddada
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Uncertainty quantification in ToxCast high throughput screening.

Authors:  Eric D Watt; Richard S Judson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.