Literature DB >> 24056003

Using weighted entropy to rank chemicals in quantitative high-throughput screening experiments.

Keith R Shockley1.   

Abstract

Quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can simultaneously produce concentration-response profiles for thousands of chemicals. In a typical qHTS study, a large chemical library is subjected to a primary screen to identify candidate hits for secondary screening, validation studies, or prediction modeling. Different algorithms, usually based on the Hill equation logistic model, have been used to classify compounds as active or inactive (or inconclusive). However, observed concentration-response activity relationships may not adequately fit a sigmoidal curve. Furthermore, it is unclear how to prioritize chemicals for follow-up studies given the large uncertainties that often accompany parameter estimates from nonlinear models. Weighted Shannon entropy can address these concerns by ranking compounds according to profile-specific statistics derived from estimates of the probability mass distribution of response at the tested concentration levels. This strategy can be used to rank all tested chemicals in the absence of a prespecified model structure, or the approach can complement existing activity call algorithms by ranking the returned candidate hits. The weighted entropy approach was evaluated here using data simulated from the Hill equation model. The procedure was then applied to a chemical genomics profiling data set interrogating compounds for androgen receptor agonist activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tox21; concentration response; information theory; quantitative high-throughput screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24056003      PMCID: PMC4029130          DOI: 10.1177/1087057113505325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  24 in total

1.  Identification of descriptors capturing compound class-specific features by mutual information analysis.

Authors:  Anne Mai Wassermann; Britta Nisius; Martin Vogt; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Analysis of nonlinear regression models: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Shyamal D Peddada; Joseph K Haseman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Dose-response modeling of high-throughput screening data.

Authors:  Fred Parham; Chris Austin; Noel Southall; Ruili Huang; Raymond Tice; Christopher Portier
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2009-12

5.  Accounting for Uncertainty in Heteroscedasticity in Nonlinear Regression.

Authors:  Changwon Lim; Pranab K Sen; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Data Compression Concepts and Algorithms and their Applications to Bioinformatics.

Authors:  O U Nalbantog̃lu; D J Russell; K Sayood
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 7.  Principles of early drug discovery.

Authors:  J P Hughes; S Rees; S B Kalindjian; K L Philpott
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  QDMR: a quantitative method for identification of differentially methylated regions by entropy.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Hongbo Liu; Jie Lv; Xue Xiao; Jiang Zhu; Xiaojuan Liu; Jianzhong Su; Xia Li; Qiong Wu; Fang Wang; Ying Cui
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy.

Authors:  Jonathan Schug; Winfried-Paul Schuller; Claudia Kappen; J Michael Salbaum; Maja Bucan; Christian J Stoeckert
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  CEBS--Chemical Effects in Biological Systems: a public data repository integrating study design and toxicity data with microarray and proteomics data.

Authors:  Michael Waters; Stanley Stasiewicz; B Alex Merrick; Kenneth Tomer; Pierre Bushel; Richard Paules; Nancy Stegman; Gerald Nehls; Kenneth J Yost; C Harris Johnson; Scott F Gustafson; Sandhya Xirasagar; Nianqing Xiao; Cheng-Cheng Huang; Paul Boyer; Denny D Chan; Qinyan Pan; Hui Gong; John Taylor; Danielle Choi; Asif Rashid; Ayazaddin Ahmed; Reese Howle; James Selkirk; Raymond Tennant; Jennifer Fostel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Data Analysis Pipeline Accounting for Artifacts in Tox21 Quantitative High-Throughput Screening Assays.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Alexander Sedykh; Ruili Huang; Menghang Xia; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2015-04-22

2.  The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Ruili Huang; Suramya Waidyanatha; Paul Shinn; Bradley J Collins; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Christopher M Grulke; Antony J Williams; Ryan R Lougee; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Mahmoud Shobair; Chihae Yang; James F Rathman; Adam Yasgar; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Anton Simeonov; Russell S Thomas; Kevin M Crofton; Richard S Paules; John R Bucher; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Quantitative high-throughput screening data analysis: challenges and recent advances.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Estimating Potency in High-Throughput Screening Experiments by Maximizing the Rate of Change in Weighted Shannon Entropy.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.