Literature DB >> 23908413

Modular neck femoral stems.

H Krishnan1, S P Krishnan, G Blunn, J A Skinner, A J Hart.   

Abstract

Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-taper; Exchangeable; Hip; Modular; Neck

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23908413     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.31525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  17 in total

1.  Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  José M Pelayo-de-Tomás; José L Rodrigo-Pérez; Carlos D Novoa-Parra; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; María Morales-Suárez-Varela; José Antonio Blas-Dobón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-29

2.  Experience with sandwich liner and its high rate of failure.

Authors:  John Junghun Shin; Ji-Soo Shin; Jae-Hyun Kim; Sung Kwan Hwang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-16

3.  Head-stem trunnion dissociation due to corrosion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

4.  Are titanium-on-titanium TiAl6V4 modular necks safe in total hip arthroplasty for non-overweight patients? Results of a prospective series at a minimum follow-up of 7 years.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sébastien Parratte; Alexandre Galland; Alexandre Lunebourg; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-07-10

5.  Pseudotumor recurrence in a post-revision total hip arthroplasty with stem neck modularity: A case report.

Authors:  Bhumit R Desai; Gonzalo E Sumarriva; George F Chimento
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 6.  How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Markus A Wimmer; Carol A Pacione; Michel P Laurent; Robert F Murphy; Carson Rider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Titanium alloy femoral neck fracture--clinical and metallurgical analysis in 6 cases.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Rebeka Rudolf; Andrej Moličnik
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  Implant Design in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jung Taek Kim; Jeong Joon Yoo
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Excellent mid-term results of a new polished tapered modular cemented stem: a study of 113 hip replacements with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jens Vanbiervliet; Jan F A Somers
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 10.  Modular Stems: Advantages and Current Role in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.