Literature DB >> 23907786

Localized prostate cancer treatment decision-making information online: improving its effectiveness and dissemination for nonprofit and government-supported organizations.

Kami J Silk1, Evan K Perrault, Samantha Nazione, Kristin Pace, Polly Hager, Steven Springer.   

Abstract

The current study reports findings from evaluation research conducted to identify how online prostate cancer treatment decision-making information can be both improved and more effectively disseminated to those who need it most. A multi-method, multi-target approach was used and guided by McGuire's Communication Matrix Model. Focus groups (n = 31) with prostate cancer patients and their family members, and in-depth interviews with physicians (n = 8), helped inform a web survey (n = 89). Results indicated that physicians remain a key information source for medical advice and the Internet is a primary channel used to help make informed prostate cancer treatment decisions. Participants reported a need for more accessible information related to treatment options and treatment side effects. Additionally, physicians indicated that the best way for agencies to reach them with new information to deliver to patients is by contacting them directly and meeting with them one-on-one. Advice for organizations to improve their current prostate cancer web offerings and further ways to improve information dissemination are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907786     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0515-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  24 in total

1.  Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics.

Authors:  G O Hellawell; K J Turner; K J Le Monnier; S F Brewster
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patrick C Walsh; Theodore L DeWeese; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Prostate cancer support and advocacy groups: their role for patients and family members.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2002-02

4.  Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Clement K Gwede; Julio Pow-Sang; John Seigne; Randy Heysek; Mohamed Helal; Kristin Shade; Alan Cantor; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives.

Authors:  U Boehmer; J A Clark
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Couples' experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research.

Authors:  Janet Harden; Ann Schafenacker; Laurel Northouse; Darlene Mood; David Smith; Kenneth Pienta; Maha Hussain; Karen Baranowski
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sue Ziebland; Alison Chapple; Carol Dumelow; Julie Evans; Suman Prinjha; Linda Rozmovits
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-06

8.  Internet use by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  R P Smith; P Devine; H Jones; A DeNittis; R Whittington; J M Metz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  YouTube as source of prostate cancer information.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Shaun Wason; Joshua M Stern; Levi Deters; Brian Kowal; John Seigne
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Meeting the information needs of Australian men with prostate cancer by way of the internet.

Authors:  Carole B Pinnock; Craig Jones
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Picture Really is Worth a Thousand Words: Public Engagement with the National Cancer Institute on Social Media.

Authors:  Yulia A Strekalova; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Physicians' perspectives on the informational needs of low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Charlotte J Hagerman; Paula G Bellini; Kim M Davis; Richard M Hoffman; David S Aaronson; Daniel Y Leigh; Riley E Zinar; David Penson; Stephen Van Den Eeden; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Richard M Hoffman; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst Leimpeter; Tania Lobo; Scott P Kelly; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; Catherine A Tomko; Amy J Starosta; Charlotte J Hagerman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Social Media Use for Cancer Education at a Community-Based Cancer Center in South Korea.

Authors:  Jaesung Heo; Mison Chun; Hyun Woo Lee; Jeong-Hee Woo
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Identity threat and stigma in cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah Knapp; Allison Marziliano; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2014-09-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.