Literature DB >> 15001506

How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study.

Sue Ziebland1, Alison Chapple, Carol Dumelow, Julie Evans, Suman Prinjha, Linda Rozmovits.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore how men and women with cancer talk about using the internet.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews collected by maximum variation sampling.
SETTING: Respondents recruited throughout the United Kingdom during 2001-2. PARTICIPANTS: 175 men and women aged 19-83 years, with one of five cancers (prostate, testicular, breast, cervical, or bowel) diagnosed since 1992 and selected to include different stages of treatment and follow up.
RESULTS: Internet use, either directly or via friend or family, was widespread and reported by patients at all stages of cancer care, from early investigations to follow up after treatment. Patients used the internet to find second opinions, seek support and experiential information from other patients, interpret symptoms, seek information about tests and treatments, help interpret consultations, identify questions for doctors, make anonymous private inquiries, and raise awareness of the cancer. Patients also used it to check their doctors' advice covertly and to develop an expertise in their cancer. This expertise, reflecting familiarity with computer technology and medical terms, enabled patients to present a new type of "social fitness."
CONCLUSION: Cancer patients used the internet for a wide range of information and support needs, many of which are unlikely to be met through conventional health care. Serious illness often undermines people's self image as a competent member of society. Cancer patients may use the internet to acquire expertise to display competence in the face of serious illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001506      PMCID: PMC381051          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  17 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

Review 2.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art.

Authors:  R J Cline; K M Haynes
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2001-12

3.  How individuals coping with HIV/AIDS use the Internet.

Authors:  P M Reeves
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2001-12

4.  The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.

Authors:  E GOFFMAN
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  1955-08       Impact factor: 2.458

7.  What predicts patients' interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England?

Authors:  Nicola Mead; Robert Varnam; Anne Rogers; Martin Roland
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-01

8.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study.

Authors:  G M Leydon; M Boulton; C Moynihan; A Jones; J Mossman; M Boudioni; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

9.  Database of patients' experiences (DIPEx): a multi-media approach to sharing experiences and information.

Authors:  A Herxheimer; A McPherson; R Miller; S Shepperd; J Yaphe; S Ziebland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres.

Authors:  V Jenkins; L Fallowfield; J Saul
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  93 in total

1.  Internet is indeed useful source for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Julia M L Brotherton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-10

2.  Comment to the paper "Surgical outcome of patients considered to have 'inoperable' tumors by specialized pediatric neurooncological multi-disciplinary teams". "Surgical outcome of patients considered to have 'inoperable' tumors by specialized pediatric neurooncological multi-disciplinary teams: should we caution against multidisciplinary decisions?".

Authors:  Eric Bouffet
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Nicole A Kinnane; Donna J Milne
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Medical paternalism and expensive unsubsidised drugs.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Julian Savulescu; Jacqui Thomson; Penelope Schofield; Linda Mileshkin; Emilia Agalianos; John Zalcberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-05

5.  Gastrointestinal cancer web sites: how do they address patients' concerns?

Authors:  Christian Weissenberger; David Müller; Jan Beranek-Chiu; Marcus Neumann; Sinje Jonassen; Susanne Bartelt; Stefan Schulz; Gerlo Witucki; Karl Henne; Michael Geissler; Joshua Fogel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sonia Kim Anh Nguyen; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Web-based cancer communication and decision making systems: connecting patients, caregivers, and clinicians for improved health outcomes.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; David H Gustafson; Bret R Shaw; James F Cleary
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Information and behavioural instruction along the health-care pathway: the perspective of people undergoing hernia repair surgery and the role of formal and informal information sources.

Authors:  Rachael Powell; Lorna McKee; Julie Bruce
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Antecedent characteristics of online cancer information seeking among rural breast cancer patients: an application of the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model.

Authors:  Bret R Shaw; Lori L Dubenske; Jeong Yeob Han; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Nigel Bush; David H Gustafson; Fiona McTavish
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-06

10.  Altruism in terminal cancer patients and rapid tissue donation program: does the theory apply?

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Devin Murphy; Christie Pratt; Teresita Muñoz-Antonia; Lucy Guerra; Matthew B Schabath; Marino E Leon; Eric Haura
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.