Literature DB >> 28380628

Physicians' perspectives on the informational needs of low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Charlotte J Hagerman1, Paula G Bellini1, Kim M Davis1, Richard M Hoffman2, David S Aaronson3, Daniel Y Leigh1, Riley E Zinar1, David Penson4, Stephen Van Den Eeden5, Kathryn L Taylor1.   

Abstract

Despite the evidence indicating that decision aids (DA) improve informed treatment decision making for prostate cancer (PCa), physicians do not routinely recommend DAs to their patients. We conducted semi-structured interviews with urologists (n = 11), radiation oncologists (n = 12) and primary care physicians (n = 10) about their methods of educating low-risk PCa patients regarding the treatment decision, their concerns about recommending DAs, and the essential content and format considerations that need to be addressed. Physicians stressed the need for providing comprehensive patient education before the treatment decision is made and expressed concern about the current unevaluated information available on the Internet. They made recommendations for a DA that is brief, applicable to diverse populations, and that fully discloses all treatment options (including active surveillance) and their potential side effects. Echoing previous studies showing that low-risk PCa patients are making rapid and potentially uninformed treatment decisions, these results highlight the importance of providing patient education early in the decision-making process. This need may be fulfilled by a treatment DA, should physicians systematically recommend DAs to their patients. Physicians' recommendations for the inclusion of particular content and presentation methods will be important for designing a high quality DA that will be used in clinical practice.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28380628      PMCID: PMC5914350          DOI: 10.1093/her/cyx035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  37 in total

1.  Physicians' attitudes about shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Kimberly Davis; Lisa Haisfield; Caroline Dorfman; Alex Krist; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha Pollard; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-05-23

3.  Perceptions of Active Surveillance and Treatment Recommendations for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists.

Authors:  Simon P Kim; Cary P Gross; Paul L Nguyen; Marc C Smaldone; Nilay D Shah; R Jeffrey Karnes; R Houston Thompson; Leona C Han; James B Yu; Quoc D Trinh; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Maxine Sun; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels.

Authors:  Lionne D F Venderbos; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ida J Korfage
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe D Violette; Thomas Agoritsas; Paul Alexander; Jarno Riikonen; Henrikki Santti; Arnav Agarwal; Neera Bhatnagar; Philipp Dahm; Victor Montori; Gordon H Guyatt; Kari A O Tikkinen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Patient decision aids for prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Grace A Lin; David S Aaronson; Sara J Knight; Peter R Carroll; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  'It's not like you just had a heart attack': decision-making about active surveillance by men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Stephanie L McFall; Scott B Cantor; Theresa L Byrd; Yen-Chi L Le; Deborah A Kuban; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; Carol L Bennett; Justin Presseau; Annette M O'Connor; Susan L Mitchell; Jacqueline M Tetroe; Ann Cranney; Paul Hebert; Shawn D Aaron
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exploring the impact of providing men with information about potential prostate cancer treatment options prior to receiving biopsy results.

Authors:  Brindha Pillay; Daniel Moon; Denny Meyer; Helen Crowe; Sarah Mann; Nicholas Howard; Addie Wootten; Mark Frydenberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Describing perspectives of health care professionals on active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kittie Pang; Margaret Fitch; Veronique Ouellet; Simone Chevalier; Darrel E Drachenberg; Antonio Finelli; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Alan So; Simon Sutcliffe; Simon Tanguay; Fred Saad; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Patient Factors That Influence How Physicians Discuss Active Surveillance With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joanna Veazey Brooks; Shellie D Ellis; Emily Morrow; Kim S Kimminau; J Brantley Thrasher
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-07-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.