Literature DB >> 23907359

Experimental assessment of the accuracy of genomic selection in sugarcane.

M Gouy1, Y Rousselle, D Bastianelli, P Lecomte, L Bonnal, D Roques, J-C Efile, S Rocher, J Daugrois, L Toubi, S Nabeneza, C Hervouet, H Telismart, M Denis, A Thong-Chane, J C Glaszmann, J-Y Hoarau, S Nibouche, L Costet.   

Abstract

Sugarcane cultivars are interspecific hybrids with an aneuploid, highly heterozygous polyploid genome. The complexity of the sugarcane genome is the main obstacle to the use of marker-assisted selection in sugarcane breeding. Given the promising results of recent studies of plant genomic selection, we explored the feasibility of genomic selection in this complex polyploid crop. Genetic values were predicted in two independent panels, each composed of 167 accessions representing sugarcane genetic diversity worldwide. Accessions were genotyped with 1,499 DArT markers. One panel was phenotyped in Reunion Island and the other in Guadeloupe. Ten traits concerning sugar and bagasse contents, digestibility and composition of the bagasse, plant morphology, and disease resistance were used. We used four statistical predictive models: bayesian LASSO, ridge regression, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and partial least square regression. The accuracy of the predictions was assessed through the correlation between observed and predicted genetic values by cross validation within each panel and between the two panels. We observed equivalent accuracy among the four predictive models for a given trait, and marked differences were observed among traits. Depending on the trait concerned, within-panel cross validation yielded median correlations ranging from 0.29 to 0.62 in the Reunion Island panel and from 0.11 to 0.5 in the Guadeloupe panel. Cross validation between panels yielded correlations ranging from 0.13 for smut resistance to 0.55 for brix. This level of correlations is promising for future implementations. Our results provide the first validation of genomic selection in sugarcane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907359     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2156-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  31 in total

1.  Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees.

Authors:  Marcos D V Resende; Márcio F R Resende; Carolina P Sansaloni; Cesar D Petroli; Alexandre A Missiaggia; Aurelio M Aguiar; Jupiter M Abad; Elizabete K Takahashi; Antonio M Rosado; Danielle A Faria; Georgios J Pappas; Andrzej Kilian; Dario Grattapaglia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Simultaneously accounting for population structure, genotype by environment interaction, and spatial variation in marker-trait associations in sugarcane.

Authors:  Xianming Wei; Phillip A Jackson; Scott Hermann; Andrzej Kilian; Katarzyna Heller-Uszynska; Emily Deomano
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes.

Authors:  M P L Calus; T H E Meuwissen; A P W de Roos; R F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Molecular dissection of complex traits in autopolyploids: mapping QTLs affecting sugar yield and related traits in sugarcane.

Authors:  R. Ming; -W. Wang; X. Draye; H. Moore; E. Irvine; H. Paterson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Differential chromosome pairing affinities at meiosis in polyploid sugarcane revealed by molecular markers.

Authors:  N Jannoo; L Grivet; J David; A D'Hont; J-C Glaszmann
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Tu Luan; John A Woolliams; Sigbjørn Lien; Matthew Kent; Morten Svendsen; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; R J Spelman; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Authors:  M F R Resende; P Muñoz; M D V Resende; D J Garrick; R L Fernando; J M Davis; E J Jokela; T A Martin; G F Peter; M Kirst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Genomic approaches to selection in outcrossing perennials: focus on essential oil crops.

Authors:  David Kainer; Robert Lanfear; William J Foley; Carsten Külheim
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  High density SNP and DArT-based genetic linkage maps of two closely related oil palm populations.

Authors:  Siou Ting Gan; Wei Chee Wong; Choo Kien Wong; Aik Chin Soh; Andrzej Kilian; Eng-Ti Leslie Low; Festo Massawe; Sean Mayes
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of genomic selection methods for predicting fiber quality traits in Upland cotton.

Authors:  Md Sariful Islam; David D Fang; Johnie N Jenkins; Jia Guo; Jack C McCarty; Don C Jones
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Genomic prediction with allele dosage information in highly polyploid species.

Authors:  Lorena G Batista; Victor H Mello; Anete P Souza; Gabriel R A Margarido
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction of yield-related traits and starch pasting properties in cassava.

Authors:  Chalermpol Phumichai; Pornsak Aiemnaka; Piyaporn Nathaisong; Sirikan Hunsawattanakul; Phasakorn Fungfoo; Chareinsuk Rojanaridpiched; Vichan Vichukit; Pasajee Kongsil; Piya Kittipadakul; Wannasiri Wannarat; Julapark Chunwongse; Pumipat Tongyoo; Chookiat Kijkhunasatian; Sunee Chotineeranat; Kuakoon Piyachomkwan; Marnin D Wolfe; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Strategies and considerations for implementing genomic selection to improve traits with additive and non-additive genetic architectures in sugarcane breeding.

Authors:  Kai P Voss-Fels; Xianming Wei; Elizabeth M Ross; Matthias Frisch; Karen S Aitken; Mark Cooper; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Improved genomic prediction of clonal performance in sugarcane by exploiting non-additive genetic effects.

Authors:  Seema Yadav; Xianming Wei; Priya Joyce; Felicity Atkin; Emily Deomano; Yue Sun; Loan T Nguyen; Elizabeth M Ross; Tony Cavallaro; Karen S Aitken; Ben J Hayes; Kai P Voss-Fels
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.574

8.  Genome wide analysis of flowering time trait in multiple environments via high-throughput genotyping technique in Brassica napus L.

Authors:  Lun Li; Yan Long; Libin Zhang; Jessica Dalton-Morgan; Jacqueline Batley; Longjiang Yu; Jinling Meng; Maoteng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Spindel; Hasina Begum; Deniz Akdemir; Parminder Virk; Bertrand Collard; Edilberto Redoña; Gary Atlin; Jean-Luc Jannink; Susan R McCouch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genomic Prediction in Pea: Effect of Marker Density and Training Population Size and Composition on Prediction Accuracy.

Authors:  Nadim Tayeh; Anthony Klein; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Françoise Jacquin; Hervé Houtin; Céline Rond; Marianne Chabert-Martinello; Jean-Bernard Magnin-Robert; Pascal Marget; Grégoire Aubert; Judith Burstin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.