Literature DB >> 23900769

Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT.

Rasmus S Ripa1, Andreas Knudsen, Anne Mette F Hag, Anne-Mette Lebech, Annika Loft, Sune H Keller, Adam E Hansen, Eric von Benzon, Liselotte Højgaard, Andreas Kjær.   

Abstract

The study aimed at comparing PET/MR to PET/CT for imaging the carotid arteries in patients with known increased risk of atherosclerosis. Six HIV-positive men underwent sequential PET/MR and PET/CT of the carotid arteries after injection of 400 MBq of (18)F-FDG. PET/MR was performed a median of 131 min after injection. Subsequently,PET/CT was performed. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn slice by slice to include the carotid arteries and standardized uptake values (SUV) were calculated from both datasets independently. Quantitative comparison of (18)F-FDG uptake revealed a high congruence between PET data acquired using the PET/MR system compared to the PET/CT system. The mean difference for SUVmean was -0.18 (p < 0.001) and -0.14 for SUVmax (p < 0.001) indicating a small but significant bias towards lower values using the PET/MR system. The 95% limits of agreement were -0.55 to 0.20 for SUVmean and -0.93 to 0.65 for SUVmax. The image quality of the PET/MR allowed for delineation of the carotid vessel wall. The correlations between (18)F-FDG uptake from ROI including both vessel wall and vessel lumen to ROI including only the wall were strong (r = 0.98 for SUVmean and r = 1.00 for SUVmax) indicating that the luminal (18)F-FDG content had minimal influence on the values. The study shows for the first time that simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid arteries is feasible in patients with increased risk of atherosclerosis. Quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake correlated well between PET/MR and PET/CT despite difference in method of PET attenuation correction, reconstruction algorithm, and detector technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; PET/MR; hybrid scanners; magnetic resonance imaging; positron emission tomography

Year:  2013        PMID: 23900769      PMCID: PMC3715780     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  23 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  MR-Based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Ilja Bezrukov; Frédéric Mantlik; Holger Schmidt; Bernhard Schölkopf; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT.

Authors:  Marco Wiesmüller; Harald H Quick; Bharath Navalpakkam; Michael M Lell; Michael Uder; Philipp Ritt; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Beck; Torsten Kuwert; Carl C von Gall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Arterial inflammation in patients with HIV.

Authors:  Sharath Subramanian; Ahmed Tawakol; Tricia H Burdo; Suhny Abbara; Jeffrey Wei; Jayanthi Vijayakumar; Erin Corsini; Amr Abdelbaky; Markella V Zanni; Udo Hoffmann; Kenneth C Williams; Janet Lo; Steven K Grinspoon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Sebastian Fürst; Björn Jakoby; Ralf Ladebeck; Carl Ganter; Stephan G Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T S Hatsukami; R Ross; N L Polissar; C Yuan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  18F-FDG accumulation in atherosclerosis: use of CT and MR co-registration of thoracic and carotid arteries.

Authors:  Kumiko Okane; Masanobu Ibaraki; Hideto Toyoshima; Shigeki Sugawara; Kazuhiro Takahashi; Shuichi Miura; Eku Shimosegawa; Junichiro Satomi; Keishi Kitamura; Tomohiko Satoh
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Molecular pathology in vulnerable carotid plaques: correlation with [18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).

Authors:  M Graebe; S F Pedersen; L Borgwardt; L Højgaard; H Sillesen; A Kjaer
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  18FDG PET-CT imaging detects arterial inflammation and early atherosclerosis in HIV-infected adults with cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  Kevin E Yarasheski; Erin Laciny; E Turner Overton; Dominic N Reeds; Michael Harrod; Steven Baldwin; Victor G Dávila-Román
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 6.283

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Combined PET/MRI: Multi-modality Multi-parametric Imaging Is Here: Summary Report of the 4th International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 23-27, 2015, Tübingen, Germany.

Authors:  D L Bailey; B J Pichler; B Gückel; H Barthel; A J Beer; J Bremerich; J Czernin; A Drzezga; C Franzius; V Goh; M Hartenbach; H Iida; A Kjaer; C la Fougère; C N Ladefoged; I Law; K Nikolaou; H H Quick; O Sabri; J Schäfer; M Schäfers; H F Wehrl; T Beyer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Quantitative carotid PET/MR imaging: clinical evaluation of MR-Attenuation correction versus CT-Attenuation correction in (18)F-FDG PET/MR emission data and comparison to PET/CT.

Authors:  Jason Bini; Philip M Robson; Claudia Calcagno; Mootaz Eldib; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 3.  Diagnostic and prognostic utility of non-invasive imaging in diabetes management.

Authors:  Cristina Barsanti; Francesca Lenzarini; Claudia Kusmic
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-06-25

Review 4.  Cardiac Applications of PET-MR.

Authors:  Peter J Bergquist; Michael S Chung; Anja Jones; Mark A Ahlman; Charles S White; Jean Jeudy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Cardiovascular PET/MR: We need evidence, not hype.

Authors:  Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  PET/MR imaging of atherosclerosis: initial experience and outlook.

Authors:  Christoph Rischpler; Stephan G Nekolla; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-19

Review 7.  Imaging subclinical atherosclerosis: is it ready for prime time? A review.

Authors:  Leticia Fernández-Friera; Borja Ibáñez; Valentín Fuster
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR in diet-induced atherosclerotic minipig: a pilot study for translational imaging.

Authors:  Sune F Pedersen; Trine P Ludvigsen; Helle H Johannesen; Johan Löfgren; Rasmus S Ripa; Adam E Hansen; Anders J Ettrup; Berit Ø Christoffersen; Henrik D Pedersen; Lisbeth H Olsen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 9.  Disease-specific cardiovascular positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: a brief review of the current literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey M C Lau; Jie Zheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-06

10.  Feasibility of carotid artery PET/MRI in psoriasis patients.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Mojgan Hojjati; Ziang Lu; Vijaya Kosaraju; Sasan Partovi; James K O'Donnell; Christopher Longenecker; Grace A McComsey; Jackelyn B Golden; Fuad Muakkassa; Scott Santilli; Thomas S McCormick; Kevin D Cooper; Neil J Korman
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.