Literature DB >> 16491424

18F-FDG accumulation in atherosclerosis: use of CT and MR co-registration of thoracic and carotid arteries.

Kumiko Okane1, Masanobu Ibaraki, Hideto Toyoshima, Shigeki Sugawara, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Shuichi Miura, Eku Shimosegawa, Junichiro Satomi, Keishi Kitamura, Tomohiko Satoh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to depict( 18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose (FDG) accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions of the thoracic and carotid arteries on CT and MR images by means of automatic co-registration software.
METHODS: Fifteen hospitalised men suffering cerebral infarction or severe carotid stenosis requiring surgical treatment participated in this study. Automatic co-registration of neck MR images and FDG-PET images and of contrast-enhanced CT images and FDG-PET images was achieved with co-registration software. We calculated the count ratio, which was standardised to the blood pool count of the superior vena cava, for three arteries that branch from the aorta, i.e. the brachial artery, the left common carotid artery and the subclavian artery (n=15), for atherosclerotic plaques in the thoracic aorta (n=10) and for internal carotid arteries with and without plaque (n=13).
RESULTS: FDG accumulated to a significantly higher level in the brachial artery, left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery at their sites of origin than in the superior vena cava (p=0.000, p=0.000 and p=0.002, respectively). Chest CT showed no atherosclerotic plaque at these sites. Furthermore, the average count ratio of thoracic aortic atherosclerotic plaques was not higher than that of the superior vena cava. The maximum count ratio of carotid atherosclerotic plaques was significantly higher than that of the superior vena cava but was not significantly different from that of the carotid artery without plaque.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that not all atherosclerotic plaques show high FDG accumulation. FDG-PET studies of plaques with the use of fused images can potentially provide detailed information about atherosclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491424     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-0005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  14 in total

Review 1.  Inflammation as a cardiovascular risk factor.

Authors:  James T Willerson; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Imaging the vulnerable plaque: a scintillating light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  H William Strauss; Mark Dunphy; Naoki Tokita
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models.

Authors:  R P Woods; S T Grafton; J D Watson; N L Sicotte; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Coronary plaque disruption.

Authors:  E Falk; P K Shah; V Fuster
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Response to injury and atherogenesis.

Authors:  R Ross; J Glomset; L Harker
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Normal FDG distribution patterns in the head and neck: PET/CT evaluation.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Dima Hammoud; Christian Cohade; Medhat M Osman; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Z A Fayad; V Fuster; J T Fallon; T Jayasundera; S G Worthley; G Helft; J G Aguinaldo; J J Badimon; S K Sharma
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the aortic wall at PET/CT: possible finding for active atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Christian Cohade; Yuji Nakamoto; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J H F Rudd; E A Warburton; T D Fryer; H A Jones; J C Clark; N Antoun; P Johnström; A P Davenport; P J Kirkpatrick; B N Arch; J D Pickard; P L Weissberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  13 in total

1.  Atherosclerotic plaque imaging by PET/CT; can inactive, active and mixed plaques be discerned?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; A van der Laarse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Utility of high fat and low carbohydrate diet in suppressing myocardial FDG uptake.

Authors:  Chidambaram Natrajan Balasubramanian Harisankar; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal; Mohammed Labeeb Abrar; Anish Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT.

Authors:  Rasmus S Ripa; Andreas Knudsen; Anne Mette F Hag; Anne-Mette Lebech; Annika Loft; Sune H Keller; Adam E Hansen; Eric von Benzon; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-10

4.  [PET/CT imaging of atherosclerotic blood vessel alterations].

Authors:  A Rominger; C Rist; K Nikolaou; M F Reiser; P Bartenstein; M Hacker; T Saam
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Nanoparticle PET-CT imaging of macrophages in inflammatory atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Matthias Nahrendorf; Hanwen Zhang; Sheena Hembrador; Peter Panizzi; David E Sosnovik; Elena Aikawa; Peter Libby; Filip K Swirski; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-12-24       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  FDG-PET can distinguish inflamed from non-inflamed plaque in an animal model of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  John R Davies; David Izquierdo-Garcia; James H F Rudd; Nichola Figg; Hugh K Richards; Joseph L E Bird; Franklin I Aigbirhio; Anthony P Davenport; Peter L Weissberg; Tim D Fryer; Elizabeth A Warburton
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Evaluation and comparison of 11C-choline uptake and calcification in aortic and common carotid arterial walls with combined PET/CT.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Kato; Otmar Schober; Mitsuru Ikeda; Michael Schäfers; Takeo Ishigaki; Peter Kies; Shinji Naganawa; Lars Stegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Imaging Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries with F-18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography: Effect of Imaging Time after Injection on Quantitative Measurement.

Authors:  Minyoung Oh; Ji Young Kim; Kwang-Ho Shin; Seol Hoon Park; Jin-Sook Ryu; Jae Seung Kim; Hye-Jin Kim; Dong-Wha Kang; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27

9.  18FDG PET-CT imaging detects arterial inflammation and early atherosclerosis in HIV-infected adults with cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  Kevin E Yarasheski; Erin Laciny; E Turner Overton; Dominic N Reeds; Michael Harrod; Steven Baldwin; Victor G Dávila-Román
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 6.283

10.  Complementarity between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Ultrasonography or Angiography in Carotid Plaque Characterization.

Authors:  Sang-Mi Noh; Won Jun Choi; Byeong-Teck Kang; Sang-Wuk Jeong; Dong Kun Lee; Dawid Schellingerhout; Jeong-Seok Yeo; Dong-Eog Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.