Literature DB >> 23900082

Bringing ecosystem services into integrated water resources management.

Shuang Liu1, Neville D Crossman, Martin Nolan, Hiyoba Ghirmay.   

Abstract

In this paper we propose an ecosystem service framework to support integrated water resource management and apply it to the Murray-Darling Basin in Australia. Water resources in the Murray-Darling Basin have been over-allocated for irrigation use with the consequent degradation of freshwater ecosystems. In line with integrated water resource management principles, Australian Government reforms are reducing the amount of water diverted for irrigation to improve ecosystem health. However, limited understanding of the broader benefits and trade-offs associated with reducing irrigation diversions has hampered the planning process supporting this reform. Ecosystem services offer an integrative framework to identify the broader benefits associated with integrated water resource management in the Murray-Darling Basin, thereby providing support for the Government to reform decision-making. We conducted a multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking regional potentials to provide ecosystem services at river basin scale. We surveyed the wider public about their understanding of, and priorities for, managing ecosystem services and then integrated the results with spatially explicit indicators of ecosystem service provision. The preliminary results of this work identified the sub-catchments with the greatest potential synergies and trade-offs of ecosystem service provision under the integrated water resources management reform process. With future development, our framework could be used as a decision support tool by those grappling with the challenge of the sustainable allocation of water between irrigation and the environment. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem service indicators; Integrated catchment management; Internet survey; Natural capital; River basin; Water resources accounting; Watershed

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23900082     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  Ecosystem services of human-dominated watersheds and land use influences: a case study from the Dianchi Lake watershed in China.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Bo Li; Felix Müller; Weiping Chen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Impact of droughts on water provision in managed alpine grasslands in two climatically different regions of the Alps.

Authors:  Georg Leitinger; Romed Ruggenthaler; Albin Hammerle; Sandra Lavorel; Uta Schirpke; Jean-Christophe Clement; Pénélope Lamarque; Nikolaus Obojes; Ulrike Tappeiner
Journal:  Ecohydrology       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.843

3.  Ecosystem Services Insights into Water Resources Management in China: A Case of Xi'an City.

Authors:  Jingya Liu; Jing Li; Ziyi Gao; Min Yang; Keyu Qin; Xiaonan Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions.

Authors:  D M Martin; M Mazzotta
Journal:  Ecosyst Serv       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.454

5.  Developing a Social, Cultural and Economic Report Card for a Regional Industrial Harbour.

Authors:  Sean Pascoe; Renae Tobin; Jill Windle; Toni Cannard; Nadine Marshall; Zobaidul Kabir; Nicole Flint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Complementary use of the Ecosystem Service Concept and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Water Management.

Authors:  Mika Marttunen; Jyri Mustajoki; Virpi Lehtoranta; Heli Saarikoski
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.644

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.