Literature DB >> 27822787

Ecosystem services of human-dominated watersheds and land use influences: a case study from the Dianchi Lake watershed in China.

Ying Hou1,2, Bo Li3, Felix Müller4, Weiping Chen1.   

Abstract

Watersheds provide multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem service assessment is a promising approach to investigate human-environment interaction at the watershed scale. The spatial characteristics of ecosystem services are closely related to land use statuses in human-dominated watersheds. This study aims to investigate the effects of land use on the spatial variations of ecosystem services at the Dianchi Lake watershed in Southwest China. We investigated the spatial variations of six ecosystem services-food supply, net primary productivity (NPP), habitat quality, evapotranspiration, water yield, and nitrogen retention. These services were selected based on their significance at the Dianchi Lake watershed and the availability of their data. The quantification of these services was based on modeling, value transference, and spatial analysis in combination with biophysical and socioeconomic data. Furthermore, we calculated the values of ecosystem services provided by different land use types and quantified the correlations between ecosystem service values and land use area proportions. The results show considerable spatial variations in the six ecosystem services associated with land use influences in the Dianchi Lake watershed. The cropland and forest land use types had predominantly positive influences on food productivity and NPP, respectively. The rural residential area and forest land use types reduced and enhanced habitat quality, respectively; these influences were identical to those of evapotranspiration. Urban area and rural residential area exerted significantly positive influences on water yield. In contrast, water yield was negatively correlated with forest area proportion. Finally, cropland and forest had significantly positive and negative influences, respectively, on nitrogen retention. Our study emphasizes the importance of consideration of the influences from land use composition and distribution on ecosystem services for managing the ecosystems of human-dominated watersheds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human-environment interaction; InVEST; Maps; Modeling; Quantification; Spatial variations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27822787     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5629-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of water supply as an ecosystem service in a rural-urban watershed in southwestern Mexico City.

Authors:  Julieta Jujnovsky; Teresa Margarita González-Martínez; Enrique Arturo Cantoral-Uriza; Lucia Almeida-Leñero
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Tracking nonpoint source nitrogen pollution in human-impacted watersheds.

Authors:  Sujay S Kaushal; Peter M Groffman; Lawrence E Band; Emily M Elliott; Catherine A Shields; Carol Kendall
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.

Authors:  G Arturo Sánchez-Azofeifa; Alexander Pfaff; Juan Andres Robalino; Judson P Boomhower
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Ecosystem services assessment of two watersheds of Lancang River in Yunnan, China with a decision tree approach.

Authors:  Chongyun Wang; Peter van der Meer; Mingchun Peng; Wim Douven; Rudi Hessel; Chenlin Dang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Ian J Bateman; Amii R Harwood; Georgina M Mace; Robert T Watson; David J Abson; Barnaby Andrews; Amy Binner; Andrew Crowe; Brett H Day; Steve Dugdale; Carlo Fezzi; Jo Foden; David Hadley; Roy Haines-Young; Mark Hulme; Andreas Kontoleon; Andrew A Lovett; Paul Munday; Unai Pascual; James Paterson; Grischa Perino; Antara Sen; Gavin Siriwardena; Daan van Soest; Mette Termansen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.

Authors:  J Canadell; R B Jackson; J B Ehleringer; H A Mooney; O E Sala; E-D Schulze
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment.

Authors:  Y Hou; B Burkhard; F Müller
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  [Ecosystem service interactions and their affecting factors in Jinghe watershed at county level].

Authors:  Ying Pan; Lin Zhen; Xin Long; Xiao-Chang Cao
Journal:  Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao       Date:  2012-05

9.  Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: a quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Shudong Zhou; Benjamin Burkhard; Felix Müller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The impact of climate change on water provision under a low flow regime: a case study of the ecosystems services in the Francoli river basin.

Authors:  Montse Marquès; Rubab Fatima Bangash; Vikas Kumar; Richard Sharp; Marta Schuhmacher
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.