| Literature DB >> 23898830 |
Shanshan Bian1, Yuxia Gao, Meilin Zhang, Xuan Wang, Weiqiao Liu, Dalong Zhang, Guowei Huang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because human diets are composed of a wide variety of nutrients that may work synergistically to prevent or promote disease, assessing dietary nutrient intake status may be informative. The purpose of this study was to assess the dietary nutrient intake status of Chinese adults with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and to evaluate its possible role in MetS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23898830 PMCID: PMC3729416 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Basic characteristics and dietary nutrient intake of case and control subjects
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | |||
| Female | 51 (41.4) | 57 (42.2) | |
| Male | 72 (58.5) | 78 (57.8) | |
| 0.53 | |||
| Heavy | 15 (12.2) | 21 (15.6) | |
| Moderate | 50 (40.7) | 59 (43.7) | |
| Light | 58 (47.2) | 55 (40.7) | |
| | | 0.03 | |
| Current smoker | 52 (42.3) | 40 (29.6) | |
| Non-smoker | 71 (57.7) | 95 (70.4) | |
| | |||
| Education level, years | 14.4 (2.0) | 15.3 (1.5) | <0.0001 |
| Age, years | 54.0 (10.4) | 53.7 (9.7) | 0.89 |
| SBP, mmHg | 144 (16.0) | 118 (14.4) | <0.0001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 87 (9.3) | 75 (9.5) | <0.0001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 28.2 (3.0) | 23.3 (2.7) | <0.0001 |
| WC, cm | 88.0 (9.6) | 81.2 (8.2) | <0.0001 |
| TC, mmol/l | 5.4 (1.1) | 4.8 (0.8) | <0.0001 |
| TG, mmol/l | 2.7 (1.8) | 1.1 (0.9) | <0.0001 |
| HDL-c, mmol/l | 1.3 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.3) | <0.0001 |
| LDL-c, mmol/l | 3.2 (0.8) | 2.7 (0.7) | <0.0001 |
| FBG, mmol/l | 6.9 (1.8) | 5.5 (1.5) | <0.0001 |
| Uric acid, μmol/l | 341.1 (52.4) | 306.7 (58.1) | <0.0001 |
| Nutrients | |||
| Energy, kcal | 2198.4 (596.5) | 1966.0 (305.3) | <0.0001 |
| Protein, g | 70.4 (20.5) | 68.9 (14.5) | 0.49 |
| Total fat, g | 81.5 (26.4) | 71.8 (17.0) | <0.05 |
| Cholesterol, mg | 498.7 (267.3) | 430.7 (215.5) | <0.05 |
| Vitamin A , μg RE | 600.3 (155.5) | 629.4(360.0) | 0.55 |
| Thiamine, mg | 0.9 (0.3) | 1.9 (1.1) | 0.32 |
| Riboflavin, mg | 0.9 (0.3) | 1.6 (0.8) | 0.34 |
| Niacin, mg | 15.0 (7.1) | 15.3 (9.9) | 0.83 |
| Vitamin C, mg | 101.9 (41.4) | 106.0 (46.5) | 0.58 |
| Vitamin E, mg | 27.5 (8.7) | 29.9 (8.7) | <0.05 |
| Calcium, mg | 457.5 (207.3) | 489.1 (178.1) | 0.19 |
| Magnesium, mg | 303.3 (78.6) | 332.3 (77.8) | <0.05 |
| Iron, mg | 23.0 (7.3) | 23.3 (10.7) | 0.82 |
| Zinc, mg | 12.5 (3.0) | 11.9 (2.2) | 0.10 |
| Selenium, μg | 58.9 (23.8) | 57.9 (17.5) | 0.72 |
| Potassium, mg | 1813.6 (377.3) | 1836.0 (513.1) | 0.69 |
| Sodium, mg | 3698.3 (868.2) | 3377.6 (685.5) | <0.0001 |
| Copper, mg | 2.0 (1.6) | 1.9 (0.6) | 0.41 |
1 P-value for chi-square test
2 P-value for independent-samples t test
Factor loading matrix and explained variance for nutrient patterns identified by factor analysis
| Protein | 0.18 | −0.05 | 0.06 | |
| Total fat | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.12 | |
| Cholesterol | −0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Vitamin A | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |
| Thiamine | 0.06 | −0.00 | −0.00 | |
| Riboflavin | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | |
| Niacin | 0.05 | −0.05 | −0.03 | |
| Vitamin C | 0.02 | −0.21 | −0.04 | |
| Vitamin E | 0.00 | −0.09 | 0.06 | |
| Calcium | −0.08 | 0.30 | −0.04 | |
| Magnesium | −0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Iron | 0.02 | 0.08 | −0.09 | |
| Zinc | 0.11 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.07 |
| Selenium | −0.06 | −0.10 | −0.20 | |
| Potassium | −0.00 | −0.08 | −0.08 | |
| Sodium | −0.06 | 0.10 | −0.04 | 0.04 |
| Copper | −0.04 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.29 |
| Proportion of explained variance (%) | 17.84 | 13.98 | 13.11 | 7.72 |
| Cumulative explained variance (%) | 17.84 | 31.82 | 44.93 | 52.65 |
NOTE: Estimates from a PCFA done on 17 nutrients. Loadings ≥0.32 are shown in boldface.
OR of MetS and corresponding 95%CIs on tertiles of factor scores from a PCFA
| Vitamin B group | ||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.47 (0.24, 0.95) | 0.38 (0.18, 0.76) | 0.007 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.21 (0.08, 0.57) | 0.16 (0.05, 0.47) | 0.001 |
| Protein and lipids | ||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.37 (0.19,0.75) | 0.98 (0.49, 1.96) | 0.96 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.43 (0.16, 1.14) | 1.20 (0.46, 3.14) | 0.71 |
| Vitamin E and minerals | ||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.90 (0.45, 1.79) | 0.73 (0.37, 1.44) | 0.36 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.64 (0.63, 4.25) | 0.73 (0.29, 1.86) | 0.51 |
| Antioxidant vitamins | ||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 3.24 (1.56, 6.73) | 1.30 (0.65, 2.63) | 0.46 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 2.89 (1.04, 7.96) | 2.22 (0.82, 5.94) | 0.11 |
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking status and physical activity level.
Model 2 was adjusted for all the aforementioned factors as well as BMI.