Literature DB >> 27192497

Quantitative magnetic resonance arthrography in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Michael A Samaan1, Alan L Zhang2, Matthew C Gallo1, Benedikt J Schwaiger1, Thomas M Link1, Richard B Souza1,3, Sharmila Majumdar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantitative MRI (QMRI) of the hip with sequences such as T1ρ and T2 mapping has been utilized to detect early changes in cartilage matrix composition. However, QMRI has not been performed in the presence of intra-articular contrast. Thus the purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and use of QMRI during MR-arthrography (MRA) in femoracetabular impingement (FAI) patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 3 Tesla MR-scanner, 10 FAI patients underwent a unilateral MRA and standard MRI of the hip joint. Global and sub-regional T1ρ and T2 relaxation times of the acetabular and femoral articular cartilage were computed in the MRA and MRI assessments and agreement of these values were assessed using the Krippendorff's alpha (α) coefficient and linear regression (μ). T1ρ and T2 relaxation times between the MRA and MRI were compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Both global and sub-regional T1ρ and T2 relaxation times demonstrated strong agreement (α > 0.83; μ > 0.85) independent of intra-articular contrast. Also, global and sub-regional acetabular T1ρ (P = 0.72) and T2 (P = 0.94), as well as femoral T1ρ , relaxation times were similar between MRA and MRI (P = 0.73) yet femoral T2 relaxation times decreased when using intra-articular contrast (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of T1ρ and T2 mapping for use in hip MRA with FAI patients. The inclusion of QMRI in MRA provides a quantitative assessment of the effects of FAI on hip joint articular cartilage while allowing for detailed assessment of labral pathology with the use of intra-articular contrast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1539-1545.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR-arthrography (MRA); MR-imaging (MRI); T1ρ; T2; femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27192497      PMCID: PMC5116000          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  21 in total

1.  Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging.

Authors:  C Czerny; S Hofmann; A Neuhold; C Tschauner; A Engel; M P Recht; J Kramer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography.

Authors:  C A Petersilge; M A Haque; W J Petersilge; J S Lewin; J M Lieberman; R Buly
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography.

Authors:  M Leunig; S Werlen; A Ungersböck; K Ito; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

4.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dGEMRIC) of hip joint cartilage: better cartilage delineation after intra-articular than intravenous gadolinium injection.

Authors:  M Boesen; K E Jensen; E Qvistgaard; B Danneskiold-Samsøe; C Thomsen; M Ostergaard; H Bliddal
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Gd-DTPA2- as a measure of cartilage degradation.

Authors:  A Bashir; M L Gray; D Burstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Cartilage T1ρ and T2 Relaxation Times in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Radiographic Hip Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Cory Wyatt; Deepak Kumar; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Sonia Lee; Lorenzo Nardo; Divya Narayanan; Drew Lansdown; Thomas Vail; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 10.995

7.  Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; R Brian Maxwell; Todd L Johnston; Mara Schenker; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Further studies on the composition of human femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  A Maroudas; M T Bayliss; M F Venn
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  T2 values of femoral cartilage of the knee joint: comparison between pre-contrast and post-contrast images.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Yoon; Young Cheol Yoon; Bong-Keun Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Simultaneous acquisition of T1ρ and T2 quantification in knee cartilage: repeatability and diurnal variation.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Cory Wyatt; Julien Rivoire; Eric Han; Weitian Chen; Joseph Schooler; Fei Liang; Keerthi Shet; Richard Souza; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  3 in total

1.  Do dGEMRIC and T2 Imaging Correlate With Histologic Cartilage Degeneration in an Experimental Ovine FAI Model?

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Larissa Arendt; Emanuel F Liechti; Katja Nuss; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Patrick R Kircher; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A novel mr-based method for detection of cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Michael A Samaan; Valentina Pedoia; Alan L Zhang; Matthew C Gallo; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Current and Future Advanced Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Early Osteoarthritis of the Hip.

Authors:  Emily S Mills; Jacob A Becerra; Katie Yensen; Ioanna K Bolia; Edward C Shontz; Kareem J Kebaish; Andrew Dobitsch; Laith K Hasan; Aryan Haratian; Charlton D Ong; Jordan Gross; Frank A Petrigliano; Alexander E Weber
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-09-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.