Literature DB >> 23897325

Breast reconstruction with the Bostwick autoderm technique.

Daniel A Ladizinsky1, Patricia H Sandholm, Stiles T Jewett, Farooq Shahzad, Kahlil Andrews.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1990, Bostwick presented a technique wherein excess skin in the ptotic breast provides a deepithelialized inferiorly based dermal flap at the time of mastectomy. This adjoins the inferior border of the pectoralis major muscle, creating a complete autologous vascularized pocket, which is then covered by Wise pattern skin flaps.
METHODS: One hundred seventy breasts were reconstructed in 110 patients. Indications, outcomes, risk factors, and complications were recorded. The association between risk factors and complications was statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Bostwick autoderm single-stage reconstruction was performed in 60 patients (98 breasts). Fifty-three patients (72 breasts) underwent tissue expander placement. Three patients had one tissue expander and one permanent implant. Complications (i.e., skin necrosis, hematoma, and infection) occurred in 40 breasts (24 percent). Chi-square analysis was performed for complications versus body mass index of 35 or higher, cancer or prophylactic mastectomy, permanent implant or tissue expander, and history of smoking. Overall complications were associated with body mass index greater than 35 (p=0.035) and prior smoking (p=0.0001). The most common complication was mastectomy flap skin necrosis (29 breasts); this correlated with placement of a permanent implant (p=0.029) and any history of smoking (p=0.0001). Skin necrosis led to implant loss in only two of 170 breasts (1.2 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: The Bostwick autoderm technique allows total implant coverage with two layers of vascularized tissue, improved breast contour and scar pattern, and potential single-stage reconstruction. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis may occur, but the extra layer of vascularized tissue almost always prevents implant exposure and loss. In certain situations, a conservative two-stage reconstruction with tissue expanders is preferred. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23897325     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Risk-reducing, conservative mastectomy-analysis of surgical outcome and quality of life in 272 implant-based reconstructions using TiLoop(®) Bra versus autologous corial flaps.

Authors:  Mahdi Rezai; Stefanie Strauß; Rainer Kimmig; Peter Kern
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Margaret S Roubaud; Joseph N Carey; Emma Vartanian; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Closed-Incision and Surrounding Soft Tissue Negative Pressure Dressings in Post-Mastectomy Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Udai S Sibia; Devinder Singh; Kathryn M Sidrow; Luther H Holton
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 0.558

4.  Comparison of Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Acellular Dermal Matrix versus Inferior Dermal Flap.

Authors:  Luís Mata Ribeiro; Rita P Meireles; Irís M Brito; Patrícia M Costa; Marco A Rebelo; Rui F Barbosa; Miguel P Choupina; Carlos J Pinho; Matilde P Ribeiro
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Tissue expander capsule for abdominal wall in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ronaldo Scholze Webster; Barbara D'Avila Goldoni; Rafael Netto; Thiago Bozzi de Araujo; Pedro Bins Ely
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05

6.  Aseptic versus Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Daniel A Lyons; Shaun D Mendenhall; Michael W Neumeister; Paul S Cederna; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-22

7.  Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm.

Authors:  Eoin M McFadden; Beatriz Lopez-Obregon; Jill P Stone; Carmen E Webb; Claire F Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-17

8.  Wise Pattern Direct Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Improved Outcomes Using Dermal Matrix.

Authors:  Harold I Friedman; Sarah Talebagha; Jarom Gilstrap; Mirsad Mujadzic; Elliott Chen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-16

9.  Mastopexy using de-epithelialised dermoglandular flaps: a case series for maximal volume conservation following breast implants removal.

Authors:  Umar Daraz Khan; Salma Naseem; Sadia Rafiq
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Identification of Independent Risk Factors for Skin Complications in a Multifactorial Logistic Regression Analysis of Simultaneous Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Skin Reduction Mastectomy in Large and Ptotic Breasts Using an Inferiorly Based Deepithelialized Dermal Breast Flap.

Authors:  Felix H Vollbach; Benjamin F Thomas; Hisham Fansa
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.