Literature DB >> 36212096

Closed-Incision and Surrounding Soft Tissue Negative Pressure Dressings in Post-Mastectomy Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Udai S Sibia1, Devinder Singh2, Kathryn M Sidrow1, Luther H Holton1.   

Abstract

Background: Closed-incision and surrounding soft tissue negative pressure therapy (cistNPT) is theorized to decrease infection, reduce tissue edema, and promote healing of the mastectomy skin flap. We report our early experience with this dressing in pre-pectoral direct-to-implant (pDTI) breast reconstruction.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent post-mastectomy pDTI breast reconstruction with cistNPT between July 2019 and February 2020. All reconstructions utilized smooth round silicone gel implants and human acellular dermal matrix.
Results: Thirty-five female patients underwent 58 mastectomies. Mean age and body mass index were 49.9 years and 28.9 kg/m2, respectively. Eleven (31.4%) patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean sternal notch-to-nipple distance was 27.0 cm. The median specimen weight was 483 g, while the median implant volume was 495 cc. The mean implant-to-specimen ratio was 1.4 for nipple-sparing, 1.1 for skin-sparing, and 0.7 for skin-reducing mastectomy. Total drain volume was 483.1 cc from each breast. Post-operative complications included seroma (5.2%), peri-incisional necrosis (8.6%), and superficial skin epidermolysis (13.8%). There were no cases of surgical site infection, dehiscence, or hematoma. Rate of return to the operative room was 3.4%. Mean follow-up was 90 days. Conclusions: In our series of pDTI breast reconstructions with cistNPT, no patients experienced hematoma, dehiscence, or infection complications. Rates of seroma, skin necrosis requiring operative debridement, and total drain volumes were lower than those reported in literature.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prevena Restor Bella Form™; Prevena Restor Bella•Form™; breast drain output; closed-incision and surrounding soft tissue negative pressure therapy (cistNPT); direct-to-implant; directe à l’implant; mastectomy flap necrosis; nécrose du lambeau de mastectomie; outcomes; pre-pectoral; pré-pectorale; résultats; sortie de drain mammaire; thérapie par pression négative à incision fermée et autour des tissus mous (cistNPT)

Year:  2021        PMID: 36212096      PMCID: PMC9537722          DOI: 10.1177/22925503211019628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.558


  28 in total

1.  Economic Analysis Based on the Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy after Postoperative Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy in the large and/or ptotic breast: A systematic review of indications, techniques, and outcomes.

Authors:  Thierry Tondu; Guy Hubens; Wiebren Aa Tjalma; Filip Ef Thiessen; Ina Vrints; Jana Van Thielen; Veronique Verhoeven
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Analysis of factors influencing drain amount, time to drain removal, and seroma formation in patients undergoing immediate expander-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyong-Je Woo; Joo Myong Paik; Goo-Hyun Mun; Jai-Kyong Pyon; Byung-Joon Jeon; Sa Ik Bang
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Edwin G Wilkins; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Hospital-associated costs due to surgical site infection after breast surgery.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Sorawuth Chu-Ongsakul; Keith E Brandt; Jill R Dietz; Jennie Mayfield; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01

6.  Breast reconstruction with the Bostwick autoderm technique.

Authors:  Daniel A Ladizinsky; Patricia H Sandholm; Stiles T Jewett; Farooq Shahzad; Kahlil Andrews
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Initial Experience Using Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy after Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Steven R Sigalove; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-22

8.  Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings.

Authors:  Pietro M Ferrando; Ada Ala; Riccardo Bussone; Laura Bergamasco; Federica Actis Perinetti; Fabrizio Malan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-06-15

9.  The Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on Postoperative Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Steven Sigalove; Noemi Sigalove; Toni Storm-Dickerson; Jami Rice; Patrick Maxwell; Leah Griffin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-07

10.  Analysis of factors that affect drainage volume after expander-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Yoon Min Lim; Dae Hyun Lew; Tai Suk Roh; Seung Yong Song
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.