Literature DB >> 23895818

Left bundle-branch block: the relationship between electrocardiogram electrical activation and echocardiography mechanical contraction.

Niels Risum1, David Strauss, Peter Sogaard, Zak Loring, Thomas Fritz Hansen, Niels Eske Bruun, Galen Wagner, Joseph Kisslo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between myocardial electrical activation by electrocardiogram (ECG) and mechanical contraction by echocardiography in left bundle-branch block (LBBB) has never been clearly demonstrated. New strict criteria for LBBB based on a fundamental understanding of physiology have recently been independently published for both ECG and echocardiography. The relationship between the 2 modalities and the relation to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response was investigated.
METHODS: Sixty-six patients with LBBB by conventional criteria had a standard 12-lead ECG and 2-dimensional strain echocardiography performed before CRT implantation. Criteria for LBBB by echocardiography included early termination of contraction in one wall and prestretch and late contraction in opposing wall(s). New strict criteria by ECG included QRS duration ≥140 ms (men) or 130 ms (women), QS or rS in leads V1 and V2, and mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥2 of leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL. Response was defined as >15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume after 6 months.
RESULTS: In 64 of 66 patients, ECG analysis was possible. Echo and ECG readings for LBBB presence were concordant in 54 (84%) of 64. Thirty-seven (82%) of 45 patients with LBBB by strict ECG criteria responded to CRT, whereas only 4 (21%) of the 19 patients without LBBB responded (sensitivity 90% and specificity 65%). Thirty-six (95%) of 38 patients with concordance for the presence of LBBB responded to CRT. In patients with concordance for the absence of LBBB, 15 (94%) of 16 did not respond.
CONCLUSION: For the first time, a close relation has been demonstrated between electrical activation by ECG and mechanical contraction by echocardiography. These findings may help identify CRT candidates.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895818     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Myocardial motion and deformation patterns in an experimental swine model of acute LBBB/CRT and chronic infarct.

Authors:  Nicolas Duchateau; Marta Sitges; Adelina Doltra; Juan Fernández-Armenta; Nuria Solanes; Montserrat Rigol; Luigi Gabrielli; Etelvino Silva; Aina Barceló; Antonio Berruezo; Lluís Mont; Josep Brugada; Bart Bijnens
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Combined identification of septal flash and absence of myocardial scar by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Manav Sohal; Sana Amraoui; Zhong Chen; Eva Sammut; Tom Jackson; Matthew Wright; Mark O'Neill; Jaswinder Gill; Gerald Carr-White; C Aldo Rinaldi; Reza Razavi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Validation of an automatic diagnosis of strict left bundle branch block criteria using 12-lead electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Xia; Anne-Christine Ruwald; Martin H Ruwald; Nene Ugoeke; Barbara Szepietowska; Valentina Kutyifa; Mehmet K Aktas; Poul Erik B Thomsen; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss; Jean-Philippe Couderc
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Reproducibility of measuring QRS duration and implications for optimization of interventricular pacing delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Charlotte Stephansen; Mads Brix Kronborg; Christoffer Tobias Witt; Jens Kristensen; Christian Gerdes; Anders Sommer; Jesper Møller Jensen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Toward Sex-Specific Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

Authors:  Robbert Zusterzeel; Kimberly A Selzman; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; Daniel A Caños; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen; Anton P M Gorgels; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Comparison of the relation between left ventricular anatomy and QRS duration in patients with cardiomyopathy with versus without left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Dulciana D Chan; Katherine C Wu; Zak Loring; Loriano Galeotti; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Galen S Wagner; David G Strauss
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Rational and design of EuroCRT: an international observational study on multi-modality imaging and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Erwan Donal; Victoria Delgado; Julien Magne; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Christophe Leclercq; Bernard Cosyns; Marta Sitges; Thor Edvardsen; Elif Sade; Ivan Stankovic; Eustachio Agricola; Maurizio Galderisi; Patrizio Lancellotti; Alfredo Hernandez; Sven Plein; Denisa Muraru; Ehud Schwammenthal; Gerhard Hindricks; Bogdan A Popescu; Gilbert Habib
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  The value of non-invasive myocardial work indices derived from left ventricular pressure-strain loops in predicting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mengruo Zhu; Yanan Wang; Yufei Cheng; Yangang Su; Haiyan Chen; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.