Andrew Day1, Ashlen Francisco. 1. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia. andrew.day@deakin.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the empirical evidence that exists to support the delivery of the range of psycho-social interventions that have been implemented to improve social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals and communities. METHODS: A systematic review of the available literature, with relevant evaluations classified using the Maryland Scientific Methods Scale. RESULTS: Despite a substantial literature on topics relevant to SEWB being identified, only a small number of program evaluations have been published that meet the criteria for inclusion in a systematic review, making it impossible to articulate what might be considered evidence-based practice in this area. Examples of those programs with the strongest empirical support are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in terms of the need to develop key indicators of improvement in SEWB, such that more robust evidence about program outcomes can be gathered. The diversity of the identified programs further suggests the need to develop a broader and over-arching framework from which to approach low levels of SEWB, drawing on the concepts of 'grief and loss' and 'healing' and how high levels of social disadvantage have an impact on service utilisation and outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: From a public health perspective, the pressing need to implement programs that have positive impacts on low levels of social and emotional well-being in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Australia seems clear.
OBJECTIVE: To review the empirical evidence that exists to support the delivery of the range of psycho-social interventions that have been implemented to improve social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals and communities. METHODS: A systematic review of the available literature, with relevant evaluations classified using the Maryland Scientific Methods Scale. RESULTS: Despite a substantial literature on topics relevant to SEWB being identified, only a small number of program evaluations have been published that meet the criteria for inclusion in a systematic review, making it impossible to articulate what might be considered evidence-based practice in this area. Examples of those programs with the strongest empirical support are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in terms of the need to develop key indicators of improvement in SEWB, such that more robust evidence about program outcomes can be gathered. The diversity of the identified programs further suggests the need to develop a broader and over-arching framework from which to approach low levels of SEWB, drawing on the concepts of 'grief and loss' and 'healing' and how high levels of social disadvantage have an impact on service utilisation and outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: From a public health perspective, the pressing need to implement programs that have positive impacts on low levels of social and emotional well-being in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Australia seems clear.
Authors: Md Irteja Islam; Verity Chadwick; Tuguy Esgin; Alexandra Martiniuk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Erika Langham; Janya McCalman; Veronica Matthews; Roxanne Gwendalyn Bainbridge; Barbara Nattabi; Irina Kinchin; Ross Bailie Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-07-07
Authors: Elizabeth M Westrupp; Fabrizio D'Esposito; Jane Freemantle; Fiona K Mensah; Jan M Nicholson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathryn J Chalmers; Kathy S Bond; Anthony F Jorm; Claire M Kelly; Betty A Kitchener; Aj Williams-Tchen Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2014-01-28
Authors: Himanshu Gupta; Noemi Tari-Keresztes; Donna Stephens; James A Smith; Emrhan Sultan; Sian Lloyd Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.295