Literature DB >> 23895061

Odor preferences shape discrimination learning in rats.

Sasha Devore1, Joshua Lee, Christiane Linster.   

Abstract

Forced-choice discrimination is a standard behavioral paradigm used to test animals' abilities in learning and memory. In this type of task, a reward association is made between a sensory stimulus and a food or water reward and the frequency of correct choice for the stimulus associated with the reward is measured. We show here that when olfactory sensory stimuli are used, spontaneous preferences for odors can influence speed of acquisition in a forced-choice discrimination task. We first show that among a battery of 53 odorants, some odorants elicit longer bouts of spontaneous investigation than others. By measuring relative spontaneous investigation times for pairs of simultaneously presented odorants, we confirm that these odor preferences are robust and reliable. Finally, we show that performance on a forced-choice olfactory discrimination task depends on relative spontaneous preferences between the rewarded and unrewarded odorants. Namely, rats acquire novel forced-choice odor discrimination problems significantly faster if the preferred odorant, as assessed by relative spontaneous investigation time, is associated with the reward. These results indicate that even subtle differences in the tendency for an animal to approach and investigate one odorant over another can lead to substantial biases in basic learning and memory tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23895061      PMCID: PMC4908962          DOI: 10.1037/a0033329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  8 in total

1.  Behavioral models of odor similarity.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Alix Morse; Esther L Yue; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Cholinergic modulation in the olfactory bulb influences spontaneous olfactory discrimination in adult rats.

Authors:  Nathalie Mandairon; Casara Jean Ferretti; Conor M Stack; Daniel B Rubin; Thomas A Cleland; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Olfactory bulb gamma oscillations are enhanced with task demands.

Authors:  Jennifer Beshel; Nancy Kopell; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adrenergic modulation of olfactory bulb circuitry affects odor discrimination.

Authors:  Wilder Doucette; Julie Milder; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Behavioral changes induced in rats by exposure to trimethylthiazoline, a component of fox odor.

Authors:  Thomas Endres; Raimund Apfelbach; Markus Fendt
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Dopamine D(2) receptor activation modulates perceived odor intensity.

Authors:  Catherine J Wei; Christiane Linster; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  Naoshige Uchida; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-19       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Behavioral consequences of innate preferences and olfactory learning in hawkmoth-flower interactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Riffell; Ruben Alarcón; Leif Abrell; Goggy Davidowitz; Judith L Bronstein; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Optogenetic Food Odor Avoidance Assay.

Authors:  Jay M Patel; Jessica Swanson; Benjamin R Arenkiel
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-10-20

2.  Shared Pheromonal Communication of Specific Fear Between Adult Sprague Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Samantha J Carew; Abhinaba Ghosh
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2020-03-20

3.  Kinase activity in the olfactory bulb is required for odor memory consolidation.

Authors:  Michelle T Tong; Tae-Young P Kim; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Pheromone-Induced Odor Associative Fear Learning in Rats.

Authors:  Samantha J Carew; Bandhan Mukherjee; Iain T K MacIntyre; Abhinaba Ghosh; Sa Li; Gilbert J Kirouac; Carolyn W Harley; Qi Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Odour conditioning of positive affective states: Rats can learn to associate an odour with being tickled.

Authors:  Vincent Bombail; Nathalie Jerôme; Ho Lam; Sacha Muszlak; Simone L Meddle; Alistair B Lawrence; Birte L Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  CPEB4-Dependent Neonate-Born Granule Cells Are Required for Olfactory Discrimination.

Authors:  Ching-San Tseng; Shen-Ju Chou; Yi-Shuian Huang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Locus Coeruleus Activation Patterns Differentially Modulate Odor Discrimination Learning and Odor Valence in Rats.

Authors:  Abhinaba Ghosh; Faghihe Massaeli; Kyron D Power; Tamunotonye Omoluabi; Sarah E Torraville; Julia B Pritchett; Tayebeh Sepahvand; Vanessa D Strong; Camila Reinhardt; Xihua Chen; Gerard M Martin; Carolyn W Harley; Qi Yuan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-04-05

8.  Associative learning changes cross-modal representations in the gustatory cortex.

Authors:  Roberto Vincis; Alfredo Fontanini
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Olfactory impairment is related to REM sleep deprivation in rotenone model of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mariana F Aurich; Lais S Rodrigues; Adriano D S Targa; Ana Carolina D Noseda; Flávia D W Cunha; Marcelo M S Lima
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.