Literature DB >> 23892955

Printing thermoresponsive reverse molds for the creation of patterned two-component hydrogels for 3D cell culture.

Michael Müller1, Jana Becher, Matthias Schnabelrauch, Marcy Zenobi-Wong.   

Abstract

Bioprinting is an emerging technology that has its origins in the rapid prototyping industry. The different printing processes can be divided into contact bioprinting(1-4) (extrusion, dip pen and soft lithography), contactless bioprinting(5-7) (laser forward transfer, ink-jet deposition) and laser based techniques such as two photon photopolymerization(8). It can be used for many applications such as tissue engineering(9-13), biosensor microfabrication(14-16) and as a tool to answer basic biological questions such as influences of co-culturing of different cell types(17). Unlike common photolithographic or soft-lithographic methods, extrusion bioprinting has the advantage that it does not require a separate mask or stamp. Using CAD software, the design of the structure can quickly be changed and adjusted according to the requirements of the operator. This makes bioprinting more flexible than lithography-based approaches. Here we demonstrate the printing of a sacrificial mold to create a multi-material 3D structure using an array of pillars within a hydrogel as an example. These pillars could represent hollow structures for a vascular network or the tubes within a nerve guide conduit. The material chosen for the sacrificial mold was poloxamer 407, a thermoresponsive polymer with excellent printing properties which is liquid at 4 °C and a solid above its gelation temperature ~20 °C for 24.5% w/v solutions(18). This property allows the poloxamer-based sacrificial mold to be eluted on demand and has advantages over the slow dissolution of a solid material especially for narrow geometries. Poloxamer was printed on microscope glass slides to create the sacrificial mold. Agarose was pipetted into the mold and cooled until gelation. After elution of the poloxamer in ice cold water, the voids in the agarose mold were filled with alginate methacrylate spiked with FITC labeled fibrinogen. The filled voids were then cross-linked with UV and the construct was imaged with an epi-fluorescence microscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23892955      PMCID: PMC3732096          DOI: 10.3791/50632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  35 in total

1.  Laser-guided direct writing of living cells.

Authors:  D J Odde; M J Renn
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-02-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Organ printing: fiction or science.

Authors:  Karoly Jakab; Adrian Neagu; Vladimir Mironov; Gabor Forgacs
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Skin tissue engineering--in vivo and in vitro applications.

Authors:  Florian Groeber; Monika Holeiter; Martina Hampel; Svenja Hinderer; Katja Schenke-Layland
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 4.  A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Billiet; Mieke Vandenhaute; Jorg Schelfhout; Sandra Van Vlierberghe; Peter Dubruel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  On-demand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels.

Authors:  Wonhye Lee; Vivian Lee; Samuel Polio; Phillip Keegan; Jong-Hwan Lee; Krisztina Fischer; Je-Kyun Park; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Organ printing: from bioprinter to organ biofabrication line.

Authors:  Vladimir Mironov; Vladimir Kasyanov; Roger R Markwald
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 9.740

7.  Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Aleksander Skardal; Anthony Atala
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Fabrication of 2D protein microstructures and 3D polymer-protein hybrid microstructures by two-photon polymerization.

Authors:  Sascha Engelhardt; Eva Hoch; Kirsten Borchers; Wolfdietrich Meyer; Hartmut Krüger; Günter E M Tovar; Arnold Gillner
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  Hydrogels of collagen/chondroitin sulfate/hyaluronan interpenetrating polymer network for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Yan Guo; Tun Yuan; Zhanwen Xiao; Pingping Tang; Yumei Xiao; Yujiang Fan; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Protein nanoarrays generated by dip-pen nanolithography.

Authors:  Ki-Bum Lee; So-Jung Park; Chad A Mirkin; Jennifer C Smith; Milan Mrksich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Beyond 2D: 3D bioprinting for skin regeneration.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yihui Wang; Bin Yao; Tian Hu; Zhao Li; Sha Huang; Xiaobing Fu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

Review 3.  Recent advances in high-strength and elastic hydrogels for 3D printing in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Cancan Xu; Guohao Dai; Yi Hong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gareth Turnbull; Jon Clarke; Frédéric Picard; Philip Riches; Luanluan Jia; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 5.  3D Bioprinting in Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Serge Ostrovidov; Sahar Salehi; Marco Costantini; Kasinan Suthiwanich; Majid Ebrahimi; Ramin Banan Sadeghian; Toshinori Fujie; Xuetao Shi; Stefano Cannata; Cesare Gargioli; Ali Tamayol; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Gorka Orive; Wojciech Swieszkowski; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 6.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  A highly printable and biocompatible hydrogel composite for direct printing of soft and perfusable vasculature-like structures.

Authors:  Ratima Suntornnond; Edgar Yong Sheng Tan; Jia An; Chee Kai Chua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Mathematical Model on the Resolution of Extrusion Bioprinting for the Development of New Bioinks.

Authors:  Ratima Suntornnond; Edgar Yong Sheng Tan; Jia An; Chee Kai Chua
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Skin bioprinting: a novel approach for creating artificial skin from synthetic and natural building blocks.

Authors:  Robin Augustine
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-05-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.