Literature DB >> 22681979

A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering.

Thomas Billiet1, Mieke Vandenhaute, Jorg Schelfhout, Sandra Van Vlierberghe, Peter Dubruel.   

Abstract

The combined potential of hydrogels and rapid prototyping technologies has been an exciting route in developing tissue engineering scaffolds for the past decade. Hydrogels represent to be an interesting starting material for soft, and lately also for hard tissue regeneration. Their application enables the encapsulation of cells and therefore an increase of the seeding efficiency of the fabricated structures. Rapid prototyping techniques on the other hand, have become an elegant tool for the production of scaffolds with the purpose of cell seeding and/or cell encapsulation. By means of rapid prototyping, one can design a fully interconnected 3-dimensional structure with pre-determined dimensions and porosity. Despite this benefit, some of the rapid prototyping techniques are not or less suitable for the generation of hydrogel scaffolds. In this review, we therefore give an overview on the different rapid prototyping techniques suitable for the processing of hydrogel materials. A primary distinction will be made between (i) laser-based, (ii) nozzle-based, and (iii) printer-based systems. Special attention will be addressed to current trends and limitations regarding the respective techniques. Each of these techniques will be further discussed in terms of the different hydrogel materials used so far. One major drawback when working with hydrogels is the lack of mechanical strength. Therefore, maintaining and improving the mechanical integrity of the processed scaffolds has become a key issue regarding 3-dimensional hydrogel structures. This limitation can either be overcome during or after processing the scaffolds, depending on the applied technology and materials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22681979     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  138 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Biomaterials from Metabolically Derived Synthons.

Authors:  Nicole G Ricapito; Cynthia Ghobril; Heng Zhang; Mark W Grinstaff; David Putnam
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Hierarchical polymeric scaffolds support the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Rosa Akbarzadeh; Joshua A Minton; Cara S Janney; Tyler A Smith; Paul F James; Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Dynamic three-dimensional micropatterned cell co-cultures within photocurable and chemically degradable hydrogels.

Authors:  Shinji Sugiura; Jae Min Cha; Fumiki Yanagawa; Pinar Zorlutuna; Hojae Bae; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  A call to craft.

Authors:  Micha Sam Brickman Raredon; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells.

Authors:  Ramya Bhuthalingam; Pei Q Lim; Scott A Irvine; Subbu S Venkatraman
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  [Gelatin/alginate hydrogel scaffolds prepared by 3D bioprinting promotes cell adhesion and proliferation of human dental pulp cells in vitro].

Authors:  Hai-Yue Yu; Dan-Dan Ma; Bu-Ling Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-05-20

Review 7.  Biofabrication for osteochondral tissue regeneration: bioink printability requirements.

Authors:  Saba Abdulghani; Pedro G Morouço
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  In-vitro blood-brain barrier modeling: A review of modern and fast-advancing technologies.

Authors:  Farzane Sivandzade; Luca Cucullo
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Heart regeneration with engineered myocardial tissue.

Authors:  Kareen L K Coulombe; Vivek K Bajpai; Stelios T Andreadis; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Digital micromirror device projection printing system for meniscus tissue engineering.

Authors:  Shawn P Grogan; Peter H Chung; Pranav Soman; Peter Chen; Martin K Lotz; Shaochen Chen; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.