Literature DB >> 23892559

Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?

Neetu Chawla1, Neeraj K Arora.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Decision-making preferences among cancer survivors during their follow-up care remains understudied and limited research examines factors that underlie these preferences. The purpose of this study was to assess cancer patients' decision-making preferences during follow-up care, the role of trust and self-efficacy, and the effect of preferences on health outcomes.
METHODS: Six hundred twenty-three bladder, leukemia, and colorectal cancer survivors were recruited to the Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care study between April 2003 and November 2004. Respondents were asked about their follow-up care experiences, including decision-making preferences, trust in physicians, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and health appraisal. Unadjusted mean scores of trust and self-efficacy measures by decision preference group were examined. Multinomial logistic and linear regressions were conducted to examine predictors of decision-making preferences and the impact of decision-making preferences on HRQOL and health appraisal.
RESULTS: While the majority of patients preferred shared decision-making (61.0 %), 16.1 % preferred to control their decisions and 22.1 % preferred physician control over decisions. Compared to the other groups, patients preferring physician control had greater trust in their physician (p < 0.001), similar self-efficacy for engaging in the decision-making process, and lower self-efficacy for taking responsibility over decisions (p < 0.001). There were no notable differences between decision-making groups on outcome measures.
CONCLUSION: Patients who prefer physicians to control decisions are as confident about participating in the decision-making process and experience similar health outcomes as those preferring greater decisional control. Physicians need to tailor their communication behavior to encourage participation and trust among all patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings from this study provide unique insights into the decision-making preferences of cancer patients during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. Results underscore the need for approaches to decision-making and patient engagement to become more nuanced and to encourage patients to participate in decision-making in ways they are most comfortable. Furthermore, physicians and health care professionals should foster environments that promote trust and clear communication regardless of patient decision-making styles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23892559     DOI: 10.1007/s11764-013-0298-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  31 in total

1.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.

Authors:  Joe V Selby; Anne C Beal; Lori Frank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer.

Authors:  Kevin D Stein; Karen L Syrjala; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Facilitating patient-centered cancer communication: a road map.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Richard L Street; Ronald M Epstein; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12

4.  Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.

Authors:  D H Thom; K M Ribisl; A L Stewart; D A Luke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Outcomes in men denied access to a California public assistance program for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Sally L Maliski; Tracey L Krupski; Lorna Kwan; John L Gore; Arlene Fink; Sarah E Connor; James R Orecklin; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

8.  Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians?

Authors:  Cathy A Charles; Tim Whelan; Amiram Gafni; Andy Willan; Sylvia Farrell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Susie H M Kim; Ephraim S Casper; David W Kissane; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Cheryl J Wiese; Beth Kirlin; Sarah M Greene; Steven B Clauser; Edward H Wagner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  17 in total

1.  Association between Internet use and decision-making preference in older adults.

Authors:  Maan Isabella Cajita; Erin Whitehouse; Chakra Budhathoki; Nancy Hodgson
Journal:  Gerontechnology       Date:  2016

2.  Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Neeraj K Arora; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  "Rather one more chemo than one less…": Oncologists and Oncology Nurses' Reasons for Aggressive Treatment of Young Adults with Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Katsiaryna Laryionava; Pia Heußner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Eva C Winkler
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-13

4.  Advance care planning: a qualitative study of dialysis patients and families.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Rebecca Feinberg; Michael J Germain; Lisa Marr; Joan Berzoff; Lewis M Cohen; Mark Unruh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Cancer survivors' receipt of treatment summaries and implications for patient-centered communication and quality of care.

Authors:  Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Neetu Chawla; Ellen I Beckjord; Laura P Forsythe; Janet S de Moor; Bradford W Hesse; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-06-17

6.  Colour Coding Navigation: "Triage" Techniques to Improve Compliance in Breast Cancer Patients Requiring Primary Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Carol Ann Benn; Yastira Ramdas; Barend van den Bergh; Naa-Lamle Bannerman; Dominic van Loggerenberg; Tia van Loggerenberg; Vernon Shaw
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-10-01

7.  Care planning priorities of older patients with advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sarah R Jordan; Christopher L Geiger; Stacy M Fischer; Elizabeth R Kessler
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale: A validation study.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Use of the Health Belief Model to Study Patient Perceptions of Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Acute Care Setting.

Authors:  Cydney Heid; Mary Jo Knobloch; Lucas T Schulz; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Factors influencing patients' preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care.

Authors:  Johanne Eliacin; Michelle P Salyers; Marina Kukla; Marianne S Matthias
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2014-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.