Neetu Chawla1, Neeraj K Arora. 1. Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3E450, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA, neetu.chawla@nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Decision-making preferences among cancer survivors during their follow-up care remains understudied and limited research examines factors that underlie these preferences. The purpose of this study was to assess cancer patients' decision-making preferences during follow-up care, the role of trust and self-efficacy, and the effect of preferences on health outcomes. METHODS: Six hundred twenty-three bladder, leukemia, and colorectal cancer survivors were recruited to the Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care study between April 2003 and November 2004. Respondents were asked about their follow-up care experiences, including decision-making preferences, trust in physicians, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and health appraisal. Unadjusted mean scores of trust and self-efficacy measures by decision preference group were examined. Multinomial logistic and linear regressions were conducted to examine predictors of decision-making preferences and the impact of decision-making preferences on HRQOL and health appraisal. RESULTS: While the majority of patients preferred shared decision-making (61.0 %), 16.1 % preferred to control their decisions and 22.1 % preferred physician control over decisions. Compared to the other groups, patients preferring physician control had greater trust in their physician (p < 0.001), similar self-efficacy for engaging in the decision-making process, and lower self-efficacy for taking responsibility over decisions (p < 0.001). There were no notable differences between decision-making groups on outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Patients who prefer physicians to control decisions are as confident about participating in the decision-making process and experience similar health outcomes as those preferring greater decisional control. Physicians need to tailor their communication behavior to encourage participation and trust among all patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings from this study provide unique insights into the decision-making preferences of cancer patients during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. Results underscore the need for approaches to decision-making and patient engagement to become more nuanced and to encourage patients to participate in decision-making in ways they are most comfortable. Furthermore, physicians and health care professionals should foster environments that promote trust and clear communication regardless of patient decision-making styles.
PURPOSE: Decision-making preferences among cancer survivors during their follow-up care remains understudied and limited research examines factors that underlie these preferences. The purpose of this study was to assess cancerpatients' decision-making preferences during follow-up care, the role of trust and self-efficacy, and the effect of preferences on health outcomes. METHODS: Six hundred twenty-three bladder, leukemia, and colorectal cancer survivors were recruited to the Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care study between April 2003 and November 2004. Respondents were asked about their follow-up care experiences, including decision-making preferences, trust in physicians, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and health appraisal. Unadjusted mean scores of trust and self-efficacy measures by decision preference group were examined. Multinomial logistic and linear regressions were conducted to examine predictors of decision-making preferences and the impact of decision-making preferences on HRQOL and health appraisal. RESULTS: While the majority of patients preferred shared decision-making (61.0 %), 16.1 % preferred to control their decisions and 22.1 % preferred physician control over decisions. Compared to the other groups, patients preferring physician control had greater trust in their physician (p < 0.001), similar self-efficacy for engaging in the decision-making process, and lower self-efficacy for taking responsibility over decisions (p < 0.001). There were no notable differences between decision-making groups on outcome measures. CONCLUSION:Patients who prefer physicians to control decisions are as confident about participating in the decision-making process and experience similar health outcomes as those preferring greater decisional control. Physicians need to tailor their communication behavior to encourage participation and trust among all patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings from this study provide unique insights into the decision-making preferences of cancerpatients during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. Results underscore the need for approaches to decision-making and patient engagement to become more nuanced and to encourage patients to participate in decision-making in ways they are most comfortable. Furthermore, physicians and health care professionals should foster environments that promote trust and clear communication regardless of patient decision-making styles.
Authors: Jennifer T Anger; Sally L Maliski; Tracey L Krupski; Lorna Kwan; John L Gore; Arlene Fink; Sarah E Connor; James R Orecklin; Mark S Litwin Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Erin J Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Cheryl J Wiese; Beth Kirlin; Sarah M Greene; Steven B Clauser; Edward H Wagner Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Neeraj K Arora; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Rebecca Feinberg; Michael J Germain; Lisa Marr; Joan Berzoff; Lewis M Cohen; Mark Unruh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Neetu Chawla; Ellen I Beckjord; Laura P Forsythe; Janet S de Moor; Bradford W Hesse; Neeraj K Arora Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-06-17
Authors: Carol Ann Benn; Yastira Ramdas; Barend van den Bergh; Naa-Lamle Bannerman; Dominic van Loggerenberg; Tia van Loggerenberg; Vernon Shaw Journal: Eur J Breast Health Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.187