Literature DB >> 23891886

The utility of data-driven feature selection: re: Chu et al. 2012.

Wesley T Kerr1, Pamela K Douglas, Ariana Anderson, Mark S Cohen.   

Abstract

The recent Chu et al. (2012) manuscript discusses two key findings regarding feature selection (FS): (1) data driven FS was no better than using whole brain voxel data and (2) a priori biological knowledge was effective to guide FS. Use of FS is highly relevant in neuroimaging-based machine learning, as the number of attributes can greatly exceed the number of exemplars. We strongly endorse their demonstration of both of these findings, and we provide additional important practical and theoretical arguments as to why, in their case, the data-driven FS methods they implemented did not result in improved accuracy. Further, we emphasize that the data-driven FS methods they tested performed approximately as well as the all-voxel case. We discuss why a sparse model may be favored over a complex one with similar performance. We caution readers that the findings in the Chu et al. report should not be generalized to all data-driven FS methods.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature selection; Machine learning; Neuroimaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891886      PMCID: PMC4251655          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  33 in total

1.  Neural-network feature selector.

Authors:  R Setiono; H Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1997

2.  Decoding cognitive control in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Yu-Chin Chiu; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components.

Authors:  M J McKeown; S Makeig; G G Brown; T P Jung; S S Kindermann; A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Information mapping with pattern classifiers: a comparative study.

Authors:  Francisco Pereira; Matthew Botvinick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer's disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database.

Authors:  Rémi Cuingnet; Emilie Gerardin; Jérôme Tessieras; Guillaume Auzias; Stéphane Lehéricy; Marie-Odile Habert; Marie Chupin; Habib Benali; Olivier Colliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Large Sample Group Independent Component Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Anatomical Atlas-Based Reduction and Bootstrapped Clustering.

Authors:  Ariana Anderson; Jennifer Bramen; Pamela K Douglas; Agatha Lenartowicz; Andrew Cho; Chris Culbertson; Arthur L Brody; Alan L Yuille; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Int J Imaging Syst Technol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Impact of analysis methods on the reproducibility and reliability of resting-state networks.

Authors:  Alexandre R Franco; Maggie V Mannell; Vince D Calhoun; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013-08-03

9.  Investigating the predictive value of whole-brain structural MR scans in autism: a pattern classification approach.

Authors:  Christine Ecker; Vanessa Rocha-Rego; Patrick Johnston; Janaina Mourao-Miranda; Andre Marquand; Eileen M Daly; Michael J Brammer; Clodagh Murphy; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Comparative study of SVM methods combined with voxel selection for object category classification on fMRI data.

Authors:  Sutao Song; Zhichao Zhan; Zhiying Long; Jiacai Zhang; Li Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Fast, Accurate, and Stable Feature Selection Using Neural Networks.

Authors:  James Deraeve; William H Alexander
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-04

2.  Multimodal data and machine learning for surgery outcome prediction in complicated cases of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Negar Memarian; Sally Kim; Sandra Dewar; Jerome Engel; Richard J Staba
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Sex Differences in Gray Matter Changes and Brain-Behavior Relationships in Patients with Stimulant Dependence.

Authors:  Michael F Regner; Manish Dalwani; Dorothy Yamamoto; Robert I Perry; Joseph T Sakai; Justin M Honce; Jody Tanabe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Neuroimaging genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease in preclinical individuals: From candidate genes to polygenic approaches.

Authors:  Theresa M Harrison; Susan Y Bookheimer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-01-01

5.  Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques in Machine Learning for Anatomical Brain MRI in Dementia.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka; Elaheh Moradi; Heikki Huttunen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-07

6.  Individualized Prediction and Clinical Staging of Bipolar Disorders using Neuroanatomical Biomarkers.

Authors:  Benson Mwangi; Mon-Ju Wu; Bo Cao; Ives C Passos; Luca Lavagnino; Zafer Keser; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; Khader M Hasan; Flavio Kapczinski; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Temporal embedding and spatiotemporal feature selection boost multi-voxel pattern analysis decoding accuracy.

Authors:  Jeiran Choupan; Pamela K Douglas; Yaniv Gal; Mark S Cohen; David C Reutens; Zhengyi Yang
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 2.987

8.  Computational models for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular drug reactions.

Authors:  Salma Jamal; Waseem Ali; Priya Nagpal; Sonam Grover; Abhinav Grover
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Sign-Consistency Based Variable Importance for Machine Learning in Brain Imaging.

Authors:  Vanessa Gómez-Verdejo; Emilio Parrado-Hernández; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.