Benson Mwangi1, Mon-Ju Wu1, Bo Cao1, Ives C Passos1, Luca Lavagnino1, Zafer Keser2, Giovana B Zunta-Soares1, Khader M Hasan3, Flavio Kapczinski4, Jair C Soares1. 1. UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and TIRR Memorial Hermann Neuro-Recovery Research Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Bipolar Disorder Program, Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Graduation Program in Psychiatry and Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroanatomical abnormalities in Bipolar disorder (BD) have previously been reported. However, the utility of these abnormalities in distinguishing individual BD patients from Healthy controls and stratify patients based on overall illness burden has not been investigated in a large cohort. METHODS: In this study, we examined whether structural neuroimaging scans coupled with a machine learning algorithm are able to distinguish individual BD patients from Healthy controls in a large cohort of 256 subjects. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between machine learning predicted probability scores and subjects' clinical characteristics such as illness duration and clinical stages. Neuroimaging scans were acquired from 128 BD patients and 128 Healthy controls. Gray and white matter density maps were obtained and used to 'train' a relevance vector machine (RVM) learning algorithm which was used to distinguish individual patients from Healthy controls. RESULTS: The RVM algorithm distinguished patients from Healthy controls with 70.3 % accuracy (74.2 % specificity, 66.4 % sensitivity, chi-square p<0.005) using white matter density data and 64.9 % accuracy (71.1 % specificity, 58.6 % sensitivity, chi-square p<0.005) with gray matter density. Multiple brain regions - largely covering the fronto - limbic system were identified as 'most relevant' in distinguishing both groups. Patients identified by the algorithm with high certainty (a high probability score) - belonged to a subgroup with more than ten total lifetime manic episodes including hospitalizations (late stage). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the presence of widespread structural brain abnormalities in BD which are associated with higher illness burden - which points to neuroprogression.
BACKGROUND:Neuroanatomical abnormalities in Bipolar disorder (BD) have previously been reported. However, the utility of these abnormalities in distinguishing individual BDpatients from Healthy controls and stratify patients based on overall illness burden has not been investigated in a large cohort. METHODS: In this study, we examined whether structural neuroimaging scans coupled with a machine learning algorithm are able to distinguish individual BDpatients from Healthy controls in a large cohort of 256 subjects. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between machine learning predicted probability scores and subjects' clinical characteristics such as illness duration and clinical stages. Neuroimaging scans were acquired from 128 BDpatients and 128 Healthy controls. Gray and white matter density maps were obtained and used to 'train' a relevance vector machine (RVM) learning algorithm which was used to distinguish individual patients from Healthy controls. RESULTS: The RVM algorithm distinguished patients from Healthy controls with 70.3 % accuracy (74.2 % specificity, 66.4 % sensitivity, chi-square p<0.005) using white matter density data and 64.9 % accuracy (71.1 % specificity, 58.6 % sensitivity, chi-square p<0.005) with gray matter density. Multiple brain regions - largely covering the fronto - limbic system were identified as 'most relevant' in distinguishing both groups. Patients identified by the algorithm with high certainty (a high probability score) - belonged to a subgroup with more than ten total lifetime manic episodes including hospitalizations (late stage). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the presence of widespread structural brain abnormalities in BD which are associated with higher illness burden - which points to neuroprogression.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Christopher H Warner; Christopher Ivany; Maria V Petukhova; Sherri Rose; Evelyn J Bromet; Millard Brown; Tianxi Cai; Lisa J Colpe; Kenneth L Cox; Carol S Fullerton; Stephen E Gilman; Michael J Gruber; Steven G Heeringa; Lisa Lewandowski-Romps; Junlong Li; Amy M Millikan-Bell; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Anthony J Rosellini; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein; Simon Wessely; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert J Ursano Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: M A Oquendo; E Baca-Garcia; A Artés-Rodríguez; F Perez-Cruz; H C Galfalvy; H Blasco-Fontecilla; D Madigan; N Duan Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: P Brambilla; K Harenski; M Nicoletti; A G Mallinger; E Frank; D J Kupfer; M S Keshavan; J C Soares Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Caleb M Adler; Melissa P DelBello; Kelly Jarvis; Ari Levine; John Adams; Stephen M Strakowski Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2006-10-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: F Kapczinski; P V S Magalhães; V Balanzá-Martinez; V V Dias; S Frangou; C S Gama; A Gonzalez-Pinto; I Grande; K Ha; M Kauer-Sant'Anna; M Kunz; R Kupka; M Leboyer; C Lopez-Jaramillo; R M Post; J K Rybakowski; J Scott; S Strejilevitch; M Tohen; G Vazquez; L Yatham; E Vieta; M Berk Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Maria A Oquendo; Ramin S Hastings; Yung-Yu Huang; Norman Simpson; R Todd Ogden; Xian-Zhang Hu; David Goldman; Victoria Arango; Ronald L Van Heertum; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-02
Authors: Michael Berk; Robert Post; Aswin Ratheesh; Emma Gliddon; Ajeet Singh; Eduard Vieta; Andre F Carvalho; Melanie M Ashton; Lesley Berk; Susan M Cotton; Patrick D McGorry; Brisa S Fernandes; Lakshmi N Yatham; Seetal Dodd Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Michael Maes; Joao Victor Nani; Cristiano Noto; Lucas Rizzo; Mirian A F Hayashi; Elisa Brietzke Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Luca Lavagnino; Benson Mwangi; Bo Cao; Megan E Shott; Jair C Soares; Guido K W Frank Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: David E Fleck; Nicholas Ernest; Caleb M Adler; Kelly Cohen; James C Eliassen; Matthew Norris; Richard A Komoroski; Wen-Jang Chu; Jeffrey A Welge; Thomas J Blom; Melissa P DelBello; Stephen M Strakowski Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Ellen E Lee; John Torous; Munmun De Choudhury; Colin A Depp; Sarah A Graham; Ho-Cheol Kim; Martin P Paulus; John H Krystal; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Ralph Kupka; Anne Duffy; Jan Scott; Jorge Almeida; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Boris Birmaher; David J Bond; Elisa Brietzke; Ines Chendo; Benicio N Frey; Iria Grande; Danella Hafeman; Tomas Hajek; Manon Hillegers; Marcia Kauer-Sant'Anna; Rodrigo B Mansur; Afra van der Markt; Robert Post; Mauricio Tohen; Hailey Tremain; Gustavo Vazquez; Eduard Vieta; Lakshmi N Yatham; Michael Berk; Martin Alda; Flávio Kapczinski Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 5.345