Literature DB >> 23891704

On the typical development of stereopsis: fine and coarse processing.

Deborah Giaschi1, Sathyasri Narasimhan, Aliya Solski, Emily Harrison, Laurie M Wilcox.   

Abstract

Stereoscopic depth perception may be obtained from small retinal disparities that can be fused for single vision (fine stereopsis), but reliable depth information is also obtained from larger disparities that produce double vision (coarse stereopsis). While there is some evidence that stereoacuity improves with age, little is known about the development and maturation of coarse stereopsis. Here we address this gap by assessing the maturation of stereoscopic depth perception in children (4-14 years) and adults over a large range of disparities from fused (fine) to diplopic (coarse). The observer's task was to indicate whether a stereoscopic cartoon character was nearer or farther away than a zero-disparity reference frame. The test disparities were grouped into fine (0.02, 0.08, 0.17, 0.33, 0.68, 1.0 deg) and coarse (2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 deg) ranges based on an initial determination of the diplopia threshold for each observer. Next, percent correct depth direction was determined as a function of disparity. In the coarse range, accuracy decreased slightly with disparity and there were no differences as a function of age. In the fine range, accuracy was constant across all disparities in adults and increased with disparity in children of all ages. Performance was immature in all children at the finest disparity tested. We conclude that stereopsis in the coarse range is mature at 4 years of age, but stereopsis in the fine range, at least for small disparities, continues to mature into the school-age years.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depth perception; Psychophysics; Stereopsis; Visual development

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891704     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

Review 1.  Visual development in primates: Neural mechanisms and critical periods.

Authors:  Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.964

2.  Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Recovering stereo vision by squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; David C Knill; Samuel J Huang; Amanda Yung; Jian Ding; Oh-Sang Kwon; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Neuroimaging of amblyopia and binocular vision: a review.

Authors:  Olivier Joly; Edit Frankó
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06

5.  The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; William Herbert; Laura Villa-Laso; Michael Widdall; Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Correlations between clinical measures and symptoms: Report 1: Stereoacuity with accommodative, vergence measures, and symptoms.

Authors:  Samuel Otabor Wajuihian
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-05-29

8.  A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Bruce G Cumming; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Effect of age and stereopsis on a multiple-object tracking task.

Authors:  Marjolaine Plourde; Marie-Eve Corbeil; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Factors Associated with Impaired Motor Skills in Strabismic and Anisometropic Children.

Authors:  Krista R Kelly; Sarah E Morale; Cynthia L Beauchamp; Lori M Dao; Becky A Luu; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.