Literature DB >> 23890360

Radiologic response to transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chang Joon Kim1, Hong Joo Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Woo Kyu Jeon, Byung Ik Kim, Min-Ji Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The current study analysed the association between radiologic tumour response and survival times of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE).
METHODS: Among 493 consecutive patients presenting to our institution between July 2002 and June 2010 with radiologically (n = 398) or histologically (n = 95) confirmed HCC, 368 patients who met inclusion criteria, underwent TACE and had confirmed survival data were retrospectively reviewed. The radiologic response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, EASL and mRECIST criteria at 1 month after the initial TACE.
RESULTS: By univariate analysis, higher Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, bilobar and multifocal distribution of tumours, larger tumour size (>5 cm), higher serum alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) level (>200 ng/ml), no subsequent radiofrequency ablation, advanced ECOG, UNOS and BCLC staging, absence of complete necrosis and non-responder (SD or PD) in RECIST 1.1, EASL and mRECIST response assessment were significantly associated with shorter overall survival times. By Cox proportional hazards model, advanced age, presence of ascites, higher MELD score, advanced BCLC staging, absence of complete necrosis and non-responder by RECIST 1.1, EASL and mRECIST criteria were independent and significant prognosticators for overall survival times in patients with HCC who underwent TACE. By time-dependent ROC curve analysis, mRECIST response criteria showed greatest accuracy in predicting survival (AUROC = 0.8676), followed by EASL (AUROC = 0.8471) and RECIST 1.1 (AUROC = 0.7986).
CONCLUSION: mRECIST and EASL criteria for assessing radiologic response 1 month after initial TACE more consistently predict the differences in overall survival between responders and non-responders than conventional RECIST 1.1 criteria.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete necrosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; radiologic response; transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23890360     DOI: 10.1111/liv.12270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  12 in total

Review 1.  Transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Tsochatzis; Evangelia Fatourou; James O'Beirne; Tim Meyer; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Multimodal treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma to achieve complete response results in improved survival.

Authors:  Pippa H Newell; YingXing Wu; Helena Hoen; Richa Uppal; John Tyler Thiesing; Kevin Sasadeusz; Maria A Cassera; Ronald F Wolf; Paul Hansen; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Role of interventional radiology in managing pediatric liver tumors : Part 1: Endovascular interventions.

Authors:  Matthew P Lungren; Alexander J Towbin; Derek J Roebuck; Eric J Monroe; Anne E Gill; Avnesh Thakor; Richard B Towbin; Anne Marie Cahill; C Matthew Hawkins
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-01-23

Review 4.  Assessment of response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tushar Patel; Denise Harnois
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  Evaluation of CT vascularization patterns for survival prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by conventional TACE.

Authors:  Davut B Hasdemir; Lukas Aguirre Dávila; Nora Schweitzer; Bernhard C Meyer; Armin Koch; Arndt Vogel; Frank Wacker; Thomas Rodt
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Arndt Weinmann; Irene Schmidtmann; Sandra Koch; Sebastian Schotten; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Michael Bernhard Pitton; Christoph Dueber; Peter Robert Galle; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Prognostic Relevance of Objective Response According to EASL Criteria and mRECIST Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Loco-Regional Therapies: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Massimo Di Maio; Marianna Silletta; Loretta D'Onofrio; Chiara Spoto; Maria Carmela Piccirillo; Gennaro Daniele; Francesca Comito; Eliana Maci; Giuseppe Bronte; Antonio Russo; Daniele Santini; Francesco Perrone; Giuseppe Tonini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does the Degree of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Necrosis following Transarterial Chemoembolization Impact Patient Survival?

Authors:  Nathan Haywood; Kyle Gennaro; John Obert; Paul F Sauer; David T Redden; Jessica Zarzour; J Kevin Smith; David Bolus; Souheil Saddekni; Ahmed Kamel Abdel Aal; Stephen Gray; Jared White; Devin E Eckhoff; Derek A DuBay
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Transarterial chemoembolization with and without Apatinib for the treatment of BCLC stage C hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shiguang Chen; Wenchang Yu; Kongzhi Zhang; Weifu Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Zi-Shu Zhang; Hui-Zhou Li; Cong Ma; Yu-Dong Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.