Literature DB >> 24716738

Assessment of response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tushar Patel1, Denise Harnois.   

Abstract

The appropriate use of conventional or potential treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma requires that benefit can be shown. Therefore, the accurate assessment of response is both critical and essential. Demonstration of benefit observed will be determined by the criteria used. However, the use of conventional criteria based on anatomical imaging to assess response and progression is inadequate. Limitations occur due to the unique nature, presentation, and course of hepatocellular cancer, any underlying concomitant disease, the multiplicity of treatment options, and the challenges in assessing viable tumor. Locoregional therapies or cytostatic therapies can have beneficial effects and induce tumor necrosis without appreciable changes in tumor size. In recognition of the inherent limitations in conventional imaging criteria, various modifications have been proposed. In this review, the goals of assessing tumor response in clinical practice and in clinical trials are outlined. The varying patterns of response to different therapeutic modalities such as locoregional therapy and molecularly targeted therapy are reviewed, and an approach to the assessment of response based on clinical, biochemical, morphological, and functional criteria has been outlined. The implications of current and proposed approaches of assessing response for clinical practice or design of clinical trials are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24716738      PMCID: PMC4008698          DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2014.891355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  35 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ahsun Riaz; Frank H Miller; Laura M Kulik; Paul Nikolaidis; Vahid Yaghmai; Robert J Lewandowski; Mary F Mulcahy; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Ramona Gupta; Ed Wang; Talia Baker; Michael Abecassis; Al B Benson; Albert A Nemcek; Reed Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Agreement between competing imaging measures of response of hepatocellular carcinoma to yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Authors:  Eugene Duke; Jie Deng; Saad M Ibrahim; Robert J Lewandowski; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Frank H Miller; Laura Kulik; Mary F Mulcahy; Andrew C Larson; Riad Salem; Reed A Omary
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 6.115

5.  Effect of surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment on alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  K R McIntire; C L Vogel; A Primack; T A Waldmann; S K Kyalwazi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Radiological-pathological analysis of WHO, RECIST, EASL, mRECIST and DWI: Imaging analysis from a prospective randomized trial of Y90 ± sorafenib.

Authors:  Michael Vouche; Laura Kulik; Rohi Atassi; Khairuddin Memon; Ryan Hickey; Daniel Ganger; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Michael Abecassis; Talia Baker; Mary Mulcahy; Ritu Nayar; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Computed tomography predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma tumour necrosis after chemoembolization.

Authors:  Mary K Bryant; David P Dorn; Jessica Zarzour; J Kevin Smith; David T Redden; Souheil Saddekni; Ahmed Kamel Abdel Aal; Stephen H Gray; Devin E Eckhoff; Derek A Dubay
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Tumor response evaluation criteria for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) treated using TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization): RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) version 1.1 and mRECIST (modified RECIST): JIVROSG-0602.

Authors:  Yozo Sato; Hirokazu Watanabe; Miyuki Sone; Hiroaki Onaya; Noriaki Sakamoto; Keigo Osuga; Masahide Takahashi; Yasuaki Arai
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.384

9.  Prognostic value of α-fetoprotein and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin responses in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Yong Kang Lee; Seung Up Kim; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwang Hun Lee; Do Yun Lee; Kwang-Hyub Han; Chae Yoon Chon; Jun Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: association with response and circulating biomarkers after sunitinib therapy.

Authors:  Dushyant V Sahani; Tao Jiang; Koichi Hayano; Dan G Duda; Onofrio A Catalano; Marek Ancukiewicz; Rakesh K Jain; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the safety and prognosis of sequential regorafenib after sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jian Zhai; Jianwei Liu; Zhigang Fu; Shilei Bai; Xiaowei Li; Zengqiang Qu; Yanfu Sun; Ruiliang Ge; Feng Xue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

2.  The clinical behavior and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and a family history of the disease.

Authors:  Jihyun An; Seheon Chang; Ha Il Kim; Gi-Won Song; Ju Hyun Shim
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Clinical implication of Keap1 and phosphorylated Nrf2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiang Chen; Yaojun Yu; Tong Ji; Rui Ma; Mingming Chen; Gaofeng Li; Feibo Li; Qiong Ding; Qingsong Kang; Diyu Huang; Xiao Liang; Hui Lin; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.