| Literature DB >> 23889893 |
Sau Har Lee, Yin Quan Tang, Anusyah Rathkrishnan, Seok Mui Wang, Kien Chai Ong, Rishya Manikam, Bobby Joe Payne, Indu Bala Jaganath, Shamala Devi Sekaran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The absence of commercialized vaccines and antiviral agents against dengue has made the disease a major health concern around the world. With the current dengue virus transmission rate and incidences, the development of antiviral drugs is of vital need. The aim of this project was to evaluate the possibility of developing a local medicinal plant, Phyllanthus as an anti-dengue agent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23889893 PMCID: PMC3726501 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Separation of polyphenolic compounds from cocktail by reverse-phase HPLC.
Percentages of individual polyphenolic compound in aqueous and methanolic extracts
| 1 | Gallic acid | 0.0004 | 0.032 |
| 2 | Galloylglucopyronside | 0.0003 | Not detected |
| 3 | Syringin | 0.0005 | Not detected |
| 4 | Syringin diamer | 0.0005 | Not detected |
| 5 | Digalloylglucopyronside | 0.0002 | 0.019 |
| 6 | Trigalloylglucopyronside | 0.0003 | 0.020 |
| 7 | Corilagen | 0.0008 | 0.084 |
| 8 | Apigenin rhamnoside | <0.0002 | Not detected |
| 9 | Geraniin | 3.237 | 17.140 |
| 10 | Rutin | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| 11 | Quercetin glucoside | 0.021 | 0.016 |
| 12 | Quercetin rhamnoside | <0.0002 | Not detected |
Figure 2Percentage of Vero cells viability at different times of incubation and dosages of treatments. (A) Vero cells treated with aqueous cocktail extract of Phyllanthus and (B) Vero cells treated with methanolic cocktail extract of Phyllanthus. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * signifies p < 0.05 compared to the untreated control.
Figure 3In-vitro antiviral assay via SYBR-Green RT-PCR. (A) Melt peak of DENV2. (B) Representative amplification plot for DENV2 antiviral assay. (C) Standard curve for DENV2.
Percent Inhibition of virus copy number in cell and supernatant at three different treatment modes
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6.38 ± 5.59 | 46.07 ± 0.88* | 4.66 ± 6.33 | 39.01 ± 5.01* | 0 | 17.87 ± 4.89* | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 94.69 ± 0.40* | 82.85 ± 3.91* | 92.78 ± 0.83* | 84.61 ± 6.58* | 93.61 ± 1.38* | 91.48 ± 3.66* | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. C + V = dengue-infected cells; and C + P + V = Phyllanthus treated-dengue infected cells. * signifies p < 0.05.
Figure 4Proteome analysis of DENV2 infected cells with or without treatment. (A) Cells Only, (B)Phyllanthus-treated cells, (C) DENV2 Infected cells and (D)Phyllanthus treated infected cells.
Differential protein levels in-treated dengue-infected Vero cells
| 3 | Q28222.1 | 1059 | Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) | 192.1 | 200.2 | 312.2 | 234.3 |
| 4 | Q28222.1 | 768 | Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp 70) | 199.5 | 287.4 | 419.3 | 282.2 |
| 5 | Q2IBA6.1 | 483 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor (HGFR) | 192.7 | 200.4 | 313.4 | 259.7 |
| 12 | Q2IBA6.1 | 136 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor (HGFR) | 222.5 | 0.0 | 313.2 | 218.2 |
| 14 | Q2IBA6.1 | 178 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor (HGFR) | 206.3 | 0.0 | 312.5 | 200.1 |
| 22 | Q2IBA6.1 | 139 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor (HGFR) | 231.9 | 237.1 | 331.3 | 225.5 |
| 39 | Q2IBA6.1 | 132 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor (HGFR) | 203.8 | 206.7 | 390.0 | 212.9 |
| 41 | Q2IBA6.1 | 120 | Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor (HGFR) | 211.0 | 224.2 | 333.2 | 221.6 |
| 37 | AAT48107.1 | 132 | Trim 1 | 187.4 | 198.8 | 366.1 | 535.3 |
| 7 | ABB92440.1 | 489 | RNA Binding Motif 1 (RBMI) | 197.6 | 0.0 | 412.3 | 222.2 |
| 8 | ABB92440.1 | 383 | RNA Binding Motif 1 (RBMI) | 206.0 | 0.0 | 362.1 | 226.7 |
| 10 | ABB92440.1 | 141 | RNA Binding Motif 1 (RBMI) | 213.8 | 0.0 | 372.7 | 221.2 |
| 24 | ABB92440.1 | 77 | RNA Binding Motif 1 (RBMI) | 180.4 | 0.0 | 362.4 | 181.7 |
| 42 | ABB92440.1 | 633 | RNA Binding Motif 1 (RBMI) | 202.9 | 222.2 | 424.2 | 313.3 |
| 27 | NP_739587.2 | 173 | Nonstructural protein NS3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 312.3 | 123.2 |
| 35 | 2FOM_B | 151 | Chain B, Dengue virus NS2bNS3 Protease | 0.0 | 0.0 | 262.8 | 123.2 |
| 38 | Q7YR26.1 | 63 | DNA topoisomerase 1 (DNA Topo 1) | 202.9 | 211.3 | 373.2 | 229.2 |
| 43 | Q5XXB5.1 | 84 | DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 | 201.1 | 212.2 | 415.2 | 311.3 |
| 44 | Q5XXB5.1 | 129 | DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 | 209.1 | 205.3 | 394.2 | 213.3 |
| 47 | Q5RF69 | 185 | Histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 | 194.4 | 189.1 | 393.4 | 194.0 |
| 25 | Q4VIT5.1 | 346 | Calreticulin | 188.0 | 200.4 | 333.3 | 213.2 |
| 6 | Q8CGV6 | 559 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PD) | 213.9 | 231.3 | 524.1 | 313.2 |
| 49 | AAF17105.1 | 151 | Polysialyltransferase | 207.1 | 212.3 | 313.7 | 232.3 |
| 1 | Q76N69.1 | 846 | Beta actin | 168.8 | 185.3 | 512.2 | 273.2 |
C = cells only; C + P = Phyllanthus-treated cells; C + V = dengue-infected cells; C + P + V = Phyllanthus treated dengue infected cells.
Figure 5Schematic diagram showing possible mechanism of dengue virus inhibition by . (A) Viral entry; (B) Viral endocytosis, membrane fusion, necleocapsid release; (C) Glucose uptake; (D) Viral pre replication and RNA replication; (E) Viral production and proteolytic processing; and (F) Viral assembly and maturation.