Literature DB >> 23887819

Neurobiology of placebo effects: expectations or learning?

Marta Peciña1, Christian S Stohler1, Jon-Kar Zubieta2.   

Abstract

Contemporary learning theories suggest that conditioning is heavily dependent on the processing of prediction errors, which signal a discrepancy between expected and observed outcomes. This line of research provides a framework through which classical theories of placebo effects, expectations and conditioning, can be reconciled. Brain regions related to prediction error processing [anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), orbitofrontal cortex or the nucleus accumbens] overlap with those involved in placebo effects. Here we examined the possibility that the magnitude of objective neurochemical responses to placebo administration would depend on individual expectation-effectiveness comparisons. We show that such comparisons and not expectations per se predict behavioral placebo responses and placebo-induced activation of µ-opioid receptor-mediated neurotransmission in regions relevant to error detection (e.g. ACC). Expectations on the other hand were associated with greater µ-opioid system activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex but not with greater behavioral placebo responses. The results presented aid the elucidation of molecular and neural mechanisms underlying the relationship between expectation-effectiveness associations and the formation of placebo responses, shedding light on the individual differences in learning and decision making. Expectation and outcome comparisons emerge as a cognitive mechanism that beyond reward associations appears to facilitate the formation and sustainability of placebo responses.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  expectations; placebo analgesia; prediction error signal and learning; µ-opioid receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887819      PMCID: PMC4090967          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  73 in total

1.  Feature-based anticipation of cues that predict reward in monkey caudate nucleus.

Authors:  Johan Lauwereyns; Yoriko Takikawa; Reiko Kawagoe; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Masashi Koizumi; Brian Coe; Masamichi Sakagami; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Isolating the modulatory effect of expectation on pain transmission: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  John R Keltner; Ansgar Furst; Catherine Fan; Rick Redfern; Ben Inglis; Howard L Fields
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Brain activity associated with expectancy-enhanced placebo analgesia as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jian Kong; Randy L Gollub; Ilana S Rosman; J Megan Webb; Mark G Vangel; Irving Kirsch; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural correlates of perceptual choice and decision making during fear-disgust discrimination.

Authors:  Axel Thielscher; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Expectations, gains, and losses in the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Jérôme Sallet; René Quilodran; Marie Rothé; Julien Vezoli; Jean-Paul Joseph; Emmanuel Procyk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception.

Authors:  Katja Wiech; Markus Ploner; Irene Tracey
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations.

Authors:  C R Meyer; J L Boes; B Kim; P H Bland; K R Zasadny; P V Kison; K Koral; K A Frey; R L Wahl
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The role of mu and kappa opioid receptors within the periaqueductal gray in the expression of conditional hypoalgesia.

Authors:  P S Bellgowan; F J Helmstetter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-04-27       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents.

Authors:  W A Suzuki; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  17 in total

1.  Association Between Placebo-Activated Neural Systems and Antidepressant Responses: Neurochemistry of Placebo Effects in Major Depression.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Amy S B Bohnert; Magdalena Sikora; Erich T Avery; Scott A Langenecker; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Effects of the Mu opioid receptor polymorphism (OPRM1 A118G) on pain regulation, placebo effects and associated personality trait measures.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Tiffany Love; Christian S Stohler; David Goldman; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: A dual-process model informed by insights from cross-species comparisons.

Authors:  Scott M Schafer; Stephan Geuter; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Placebo analgesia enhances descending pain-related effective connectivity: a dynamic causal modeling study of endogenous pain modulation.

Authors:  Landrew S Sevel; Jason G Craggs; Donald D Price; Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Salience Network Functional Connectivity Predicts Placebo Effects in Major Depression.

Authors:  Magdalena Sikora; Joseph Heffernan; Erich T Avery; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Marta Peciña
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-01

6.  Inferring distinct mechanisms in the absence of subjective differences: Placebo and centrally acting analgesic underlie unique brain adaptations.

Authors:  Pascal Tétreault; Marwan N Baliki; Alexis T Baria; William R Bauer; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Engaging endogenous opioid circuits in pain affective processes.

Authors:  Blake A Kimmey; Nora M McCall; Lisa M Wooldridge; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Gregory Corder
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Meta-analysis of neural systems underlying placebo analgesia from individual participant fMRI data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Tamás Spisák; Tor D Wager; Ulrike Bingel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  μ Opioid Antagonist Naltrexone Partially Abolishes the Antidepressant Placebo Effect and Reduces Orbitofrontal Cortex Encoding of Reinforcement.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Jiazhou Chen; Thandi Lyew; Jordan F Karp; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-03-06

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of placebo responses in humans.

Authors:  M Peciña; J-K Zubieta
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.