Literature DB >> 26350246

Computational approaches to study the effects of small genomic variations.

Kamil Khafizov1, Maxim V Ivanov, Olga V Glazova, Sergei P Kovalenko.   

Abstract

Advances in DNA sequencing technologies have led to an avalanche-like increase in the number of gene sequences deposited in public databases over the last decade as well as the detection of an enormous number of previously unseen nucleotide variants therein. Given the size and complex nature of the genome-wide sequence variation data, as well as the rate of data generation, experimental characterization of the disease association of each of these variations or their effects on protein structure/function would be costly, laborious, time-consuming, and essentially impossible. Thus, in silico methods to predict the functional effects of sequence variations are constantly being developed. In this review, we summarize the major computational approaches and tools that are aimed at the prediction of the functional effect of mutations, and describe the state-of-the-art databases that can be used to obtain information about mutation significance. We also discuss future directions in this highly competitive field.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26350246     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-015-2794-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  155 in total

1.  Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants.

Authors:  Janita Thusberg; Ayodeji Olatubosun; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and its exploitation in the fields of personalized genomics and molecular evolution.

Authors:  Peter D Stenson; Edward V Ball; Matthew Mort; Andrew D Phillips; Katy Shaw; David N Cooper
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09

4.  Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.

Authors:  Fabian Sievers; Andreas Wilm; David Dineen; Toby J Gibson; Kevin Karplus; Weizhong Li; Rodrigo Lopez; Hamish McWilliam; Michael Remmert; Johannes Söding; Julie D Thompson; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.429

5.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Penny C Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Chris Boursnell; Ningze Pang; Kristoffer Forslund; Goran Ceric; Jody Clements; Andreas Heger; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Accurate prediction of the functional significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms and mutations in the ABCA1 gene.

Authors:  Liam R Brunham; Roshni R Singaraja; Terry D Pape; Anish Kejariwal; Paul D Thomas; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  M D Shaji Kumar; K Abdulla Bava; M Michael Gromiha; Ponraj Prabakaran; Koji Kitajima; Hatsuho Uedaira; Akinori Sarai
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer.

Authors:  Simon A Forbes; David Beare; Prasad Gunasekaran; Kenric Leung; Nidhi Bindal; Harry Boutselakis; Minjie Ding; Sally Bamford; Charlotte Cole; Sari Ward; Chai Yin Kok; Mingming Jia; Tisham De; Jon W Teague; Michael R Stratton; Ultan McDermott; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee.

Authors:  Iain M Wallace; Orla O'Sullivan; Desmond G Higgins; Cedric Notredame
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function.

Authors:  Yana Bromberg; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Mutation near the binding interfaces at α-hemoglobin stabilizing protein is highly pathogenic.

Authors:  Jesu Francis Borgio; Mohammed S Al-Madan; Sayed AbdulAzeez
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  New variants in Spanish Niemann-Pick type c disease patients.

Authors:  Laura López de Frutos; Jorge J Cebolla; Luis Aldámiz-Echevarría; Ángela de la Vega; Sinziana Stanescu; Carlos Lahoz; Pilar Irún; Pilar Giraldo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.

Authors:  Marek Grabowski; Ewa Niedzialkowska; Matthew D Zimmerman; Wladek Minor
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2016-03-02

4.  Vermont: a multi-perspective visual interactive platform for mutational analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre V Fassio; Pedro M Martins; Samuel da S Guimarães; Sócrates S A Junior; Vagner S Ribeiro; Raquel C de Melo-Minardi; Sabrina de A Silveira
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Targeted sequencing reveals complex, phenotype-correlated genotypes in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Maxim Ivanov; Alina Matsvay; Olga Glazova; Stanislav Krasovskiy; Mariya Usacheva; Elena Amelina; Aleksandr Chernyak; Mikhail Ivanov; Sergey Musienko; Timofey Prodanov; Sergey Kovalenko; Ancha Baranova; Kamil Khafizov
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.063

6.  In silico analyses of Wnt1 nsSNPs reveal structurally destabilizing variants, altered interactions with Frizzled receptors and its deregulation in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Amalesh Mondal; Debarati Paul; Shubhra Ghosh Dastidar; Tanima Saha; Achintya Mohan Goswami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  In-Silico Computing of the Most Deleterious nsSNPs in HBA1 Gene.

Authors:  Sayed AbdulAzeez; J Francis Borgio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Understanding molecular consequences of putative drug resistant mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Stephanie Portelli; Jody E Phelan; David B Ascher; Taane G Clark; Nicholas Furnham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Electrochemical Detection of Solution Phase Hybridization Related to Single Nucleotide Mutation by Carbon Nanofibers Enriched Electrodes.

Authors:  Arzum Erdem; Ece Eksin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Predicting the Most Deleterious Missense Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Hennekam Syndrome-Causing CCBE1 Gene, In Silico Analysis.

Authors:  Khyber Shinwari; Liu Guojun; Svetlana S Deryabina; Mikhail A Bolkov; Irina A Tuzankina; Valery A Chereshnev
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-06-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.