Literature DB >> 21333367

Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances.

Brett R Fajen1, Gabriel Diaz, Christopher Cramer.   

Abstract

Many locomotor tasks require actors to choose among different categories of action, such as when deciding whether to cross the street in front of an approaching vehicle or wait until it passes. In such cases, the actor's locomotor capabilities partly determine which actions are possible, and therefore must be taken into account. The present study was designed to re-evaluate the claim that people do not know their locomotor capabilities until they begin moving because they rely entirely on information that is picked up "on the fly" (Oudejans, Michaels, Bakker, & Dolné, 1996). Three experiments were conducted in which participants judged while stationary or moving whether it was within their capabilities to catch a fly ball or pass through a shrinking gap. The main finding was that judgments were equally accurate regardless of whether participants were stationary or allowed to move for a brief period. We conclude that stationary and moving actors know their locomotor capabilities equally well, and that actors do not rely entirely on information that is picked up on the fly.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21333367     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  11 in total

1.  Increased Risk of Musculoskeletal Injury Following Sport-Related Concussion: A Perception-Action Coupling Approach.

Authors:  Shawn R Eagle; Anthony P Kontos; Gert-Jan Pepping; Caleb D Johnson; Aaron Sinnott; Alice LaGoy; Chris Connaboy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Melissa S Parade; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Affordances as Probabilistic Functions: Implications for Development, Perception, and Decisions for Action.

Authors:  John Franchak; Karen Adolph
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2014

4.  The effects of obstacle proximity on aperture crossing behaviours.

Authors:  Carmen S Baker; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Key properties of expert movement systems in sport : an ecological dynamics perspective.

Authors:  Ludovic Seifert; Chris Button; Keith Davids
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Emma C Celano; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Direct perception of action-scaled affordances: the shrinking gap problem.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Guiding locomotion in complex, dynamic environments.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Visual and non-visual contributions to the perception of object motion during self-motion.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Affordance-based versus current-future accounts of choosing whether to pursue or abandon the chase of a moving target.

Authors:  Scott T Steinmetz; Oliver W Layton; Nathaniel V Powell; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.