Literature DB >> 23886958

Context effects on auditory distraction.

Sufen Chen1, Elyse S Sussman.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to test the hypothesis that sound context modulates the magnitude of auditory distraction, indexed by behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Participants were asked to identify tone duration, while irrelevant changes occurred in tone frequency, tone intensity, and harmonic structure. Frequency deviants were randomly intermixed with standards (Uni-Condition), with intensity deviants (Bi-Condition), and with both intensity and complex deviants (Tri-Condition). Only in the Tri-Condition did the auditory distraction effect reflect the magnitude difference among the frequency and intensity deviants. The mixture of the different types of deviants in the Tri-Condition modulated the perceived level of distraction, demonstrating that the sound context can modulate the effect of deviance level on processing irrelevant acoustic changes in the environment. These findings thus indicate that perceptual contrast plays a role in change detection processes that leads to auditory distraction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory distraction; Deviance level; Magnitude effect; Mismatch negativity (MMN); P3a

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886958      PMCID: PMC3953149          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  20 in total

1.  Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices.

Authors:  E Schröger; M H Giard; C Wolff
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?

Authors:  T Jacobsen; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty.

Authors:  D Friedman; Y M Cycowicz; H Gaeta
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down predictive information.

Authors:  T Rinne; S Antila; I Winkler
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Bertram Opitz; Axel Mecklinger; Christoph Krick; Wolfgang Reith; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

7.  Small changes in temporal deviance modulate mismatch negativity amplitude in humans.

Authors:  Michael A Kisley; Deana B Davalos; Heidi S Layton; Deborah Pratt; Jamey K Ellis; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  E Schröger; C Wolff
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-10-26       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 9.  Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans.

Authors:  R T Knight; D Scabini
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task.

Authors:  H Gomes; S Molholm; W Ritter; D Kurtzberg; N Cowan; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Elyse S Sussman; Dean Salisbury; Valerie L Shafer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Neurophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Mandarin Lexical Tone Processing.

Authors:  Yan H Yu; Valerie L Shafer; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  When listening to rain sounds boosts arithmetic ability.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Francesco De Benedetto; Maria Vittoria Ferrari; Giorgia Ferrarini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Role of Temporal Acoustic Exaggeration in High Variability Phonetic Training: A Behavioral and ERP Study.

Authors:  Bing Cheng; Xiaojuan Zhang; Siying Fan; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.