Literature DB >> 23884651

Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution.

Martin Hughes1, Sylvain Gerber, Matthew Albion Wills.   

Abstract

There are few putative macroevolutionary trends or rules that withstand scrutiny. Here, we test and verify the purported tendency for animal clades to reach their maximum morphological variety relatively early in their evolutionary histories (early high disparity). We present a meta-analysis of 98 metazoan clades radiating throughout the Phanerozoic. The disparity profiles of groups through time are summarized in terms of their center of gravity (CG), with values above and below 0.50 indicating top- and bottom-heaviness, respectively. Clades that terminate at one of the "big five" mass extinction events tend to have truncated trajectories, with a significantly top-heavy CG distribution overall. The remaining 63 clades show the opposite tendency, with a significantly bottom-heavy mean CG (relatively early high disparity). Resampling tests are used to identify groups with a CG significantly above or below 0.50; clades not terminating at a mass extinction are three times more likely to be significantly bottom-heavy than top-heavy. Overall, there is no clear temporal trend in disparity profile shapes from the Cambrian to the Recent, and early high disparity is the predominant pattern throughout the Phanerozoic. Our results do not allow us to distinguish between ecological and developmental explanations for this phenomenon. To the extent that ecology has a role, however, the paucity of bottom-heavy clades radiating in the immediate wake of mass extinctions suggests that early high disparity more probably results from the evolution of key apomorphies at the base of clades rather than from physical drivers or catastrophic ecospace clearing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clade center of gravity; clade shape; macroevolution; morphological disparity; morphospace

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884651      PMCID: PMC3752257          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1302642110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

Review 1.  Early animal evolution: emerging views from comparative biology and geology.

Authors:  A H Knoll; S B Carroll
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evolutionary exploitation of design options by the first animals with hard skeletons.

Authors:  R D Thomas; R M Shearman; G W Stewart
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Lessons from the past: biotic recoveries from mass extinctions.

Authors:  D H Erwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effect of development on the direction of evolution: toward a twenty-first century consensus.

Authors:  Wallace Arthur
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  The evolution of large size: how does Cope's Rule work?

Authors:  David W E Hone; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Morphological disparity in the cambrian.

Authors:  D E Briggs; R A Fortey; M A Wills
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Explosive morphological diversification of spiny-finned teleost fishes in the aftermath of the end-Cretaceous extinction.

Authors:  Matt Friedman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A conceptual and statistical framework for adaptive radiations with a key role for diversity dependence.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; Bart Haegeman
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  The Darwinian revolution as viewed by a philosophical biologist.

Authors:  Michael T Ghiselin
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.326

Review 10.  Why do almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? Developmental constraints, Hox genes, and cancer.

Authors:  F Galis
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1999-04-15
View more
  55 in total

1.  What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Peter J Wagner; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Iterative adaptive radiations of fossil canids show no evidence for diversity-dependent trait evolution.

Authors:  Graham J Slater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Exploring macroevolution using modern and fossil data.

Authors:  Michael J Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Trait-based diversification shifts reflect differential extinction among fossil taxa.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner; George F Estabrook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Not-so-early bursts and the dynamic nature of morphological diversification.

Authors:  Graham J Slater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dynamic evolutionary change in post-Paleozoic echinoids and the importance of scale when interpreting changes in rates of evolution.

Authors:  Melanie J Hopkins; Andrew B Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Post-Cretaceous bursts of evolution along the benthic-pelagic axis in marine fishes.

Authors:  Emanuell Ribeiro; Aaron M Davis; Rafael A Rivero-Vega; Guillermo Ortí; Ricardo Betancur-R
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Species richness and disparity of parareptiles across the end-Permian mass extinction.

Authors:  Mark J MacDougall; Neil Brocklehurst; Jörg Fröbisch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Slow and steady: the evolution of cranial disparity in fossil and recent turtles.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Walter G Joyce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.