Literature DB >> 15230968

The effect of development on the direction of evolution: toward a twenty-first century consensus.

Wallace Arthur1.   

Abstract

One of the most important questions in evolutionary biology is: what orients the evolutionary process? That is, what causes evolution to proceed toward certain developmental trajectories, and hence phenotypes, rather than others? In particular, there has been prolonged controversy over whether the direction of evolution is determined solely by external factors or whether the nature of the ontogenetic process, and the ways in which it can be altered by mutations in developmental genes, may also play a major role. Here, I examine this issue, concentrating on the following: the possible evolutionary orienting role of "developmental bias;" the question of whether selection can and/or will break bias; the extent to which bias is already incorporated in quantitative genetic studies; and ways of approaching the possible role of bias in the origin of evolutionary novelties. Finally, I suggest that developmental bias may provide a focal point for the coming together of conceptual and practical approaches to evo-devo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230968     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04033.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  20 in total

1.  Evolution and development of facial bone morphology in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; Bonnie Ullmann; Charline Walker; Catherine Wilson; Mark Currey; Patrick C Phillips; Michael A Bell; John H Postlethwait; William A Cresko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Detection of length-dependent effects of tandem repeat alleles by 3-D geometric decomposition of craniofacial variation.

Authors:  John W Fondon; Harold R Garner
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  A generative bias towards average complexity in artificial cell lineages.

Authors:  Rolf Lohaus; Nicholas L Geard; Janet Wiles; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution.

Authors:  Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew Albion Wills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiple ancient origins of neoteny in Lycidae(Coleoptera): consequences for ecology and macroevolution.

Authors:  Ladislav Bocak; Milada Bocakova; Toby Hunt; Alfred P Vogler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Looking at the origin of phenotypic variation from pattern formation gene networks.

Authors:  Isaac Salazar-Ciudad
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 7.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Convergent developmental patterns underlie the repeated evolution of adhesive toe pads among lizards.

Authors:  Aaron H Griffing; Tony Gamble; Martin J Cohn; Thomas J Sanger
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.138

9.  Chronic fatigue syndrome defies the mind-body-schism of medicine. New perspectives on a multiple realisable developmental systems disorder.

Authors:  Elling Ulvestad
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-02-21

10.  Bias and evolution of the mutationally accessible phenotypic space in a developmental system.

Authors:  Christian Braendle; Charles F Baer; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.