Literature DB >> 23884548

Educational needs and preferred methods of learning among Florida practitioners who order genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Deborah Cragun1, Andrea Doty Besharat, Courtney Lewis, Susan T Vadaparampil, Tuya Pal.   

Abstract

With the expansion of genetic testing options due to tremendous advances in sequencing technologies, testing will increasingly be offered by a variety of healthcare providers in diverse settings, as has been observed with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) gene testing over the last decade. In an effort to assess the educational needs and preferences of healthcare providers primarily in a community-based setting, we mailed a survey to healthcare providers across Florida who order BRCA testing. Within the packet, a supplemental card was included to give participants the opportunity to request free clinical educational resources from the investigative team. Of 81 eligible providers who completed the survey, most were physicians or nurse practitioners; and over 90 % worked in a community or private practice setting. Respondents provided BRCA testing services for a median of 5 years, but the majority (56 %) reported no formal training in clinical cancer genetics. Most respondents (95 %) expressed interest in formal training opportunities, with 3-day in-person weekend training representing the most highly preferred format. The most widely selected facilitators to participation were minimal requirement to take time off work and continuing education credits. Overall, 64 % of respondents requested free clinical educational resources. Preferences for informal education included written materials and in-person presentations; whereas accessing a DVD or website were less popular. Findings from our study highlight both the need for and interest in ongoing educational opportunities and resources among community providers who order BRCA testing. These results can be used to enhance participation of community-based providers in educational training programs by targeting educational resources to the most preferred format.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884548     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0525-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  22 in total

1.  Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence.

Authors:  Paul E Mazmanian; David A Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Deterrents to nurses' participation in continuing professional development: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Donna J Schweitzer; Teresa J Krassa
Journal:  J Contin Educ Nurs       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.224

3.  Perceived barriers to completing an e-learning program on evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; France Légaré; Michel Labrecque; Pierre Frémont; Michel Cauchon; Marie Desmartis
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2007

Review 4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Mark E Robson; Courtney D Storm; Jeffrey Weitzel; Dana S Wollins; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Barriers to continuing medical education in Australian prevocational doctors.

Authors:  Sandra L Neate; Andrew W Dent; Tracey J Weiland; Stephen Farish; Brian C Jolly; Brendan Crotty
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Impact on clinical behavior of face-to-face continuing medical education blended with online spaced education: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Timothy Shaw; Andrea Long; Sanjiv Chopra; B Price Kerfoot
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Continuing education for advanced manual and manipulative physiotherapists in Canada: a survey of perceived needs.

Authors:  Joyce Chau; Pamela Chadbourn; Rebecca Hamel; Sherman Mok; Bradley Robles; Lianne Chan; Cheryl Cott; Euson Yeung
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Developing education tailored to clinical roles: genetics education for haemophilia nurses.

Authors:  Sarah Burke; Colin Barker; Dianne Marshall
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.

Authors:  L Wideroff; S T Vadaparampil; M H Greene; S Taplin; L Olson; A N Freedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Ekland Abdiwahab; Heather M Edwards; Min-Lin Fang; Andrew Jdayani; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Courtney Scherr; Lucia Camperlengo; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2016-08-15

3.  Breast cancer screening implications of risk modeling among female relatives of ATM and CHEK2 carriers.

Authors:  Anne E Weidner; Mariel E Liggin; Brenda I Zuniga; Ann L Tezak; Georgia L Wiesner; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Pre-test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non-genetics professionals in the state of Florida.

Authors:  S T Vadaparampil; C L Scherr; D Cragun; T L Malo; T Pal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Public Health Approaches and Barriers to Educating Providers about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

Authors:  Angela M Trepanier; Laura Supplee; Lindsey Blakely; Jenna McLosky; Debra Duquette
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-11

Review 6.  Hereditary Cancer: Example of a Public Health Approach to Ensure Population Health Benefits of Genetic Medicine.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Courtney Lewis; Lucia Camperlengo; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-08

7.  A systematic review of communication interventions to help healthcare professionals discuss genetic testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Starkings; Valerie Shilling; Valerie Jenkins; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Medical Hematology/Oncology Fellows' Perceptions of Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Eric K Singhi; Megan M Dupuis; Jeremy A Ross; Alyssa G Rieber; Nishin A Bhadkamkar
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.037

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.