Literature DB >> 23884383

Comparison of peristomal adhesion formation between laparoscopic and open low anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Woon Kyung Jeong1, Ji Won Park, Hyo Seong Choi, Seung-Yong Jeong, Jae Hwan Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adhesions appear to be less common following laparoscopic surgery than after conventional open surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of laparoscopic and conventional open rectal surgery on peristomal adhesion formation.
METHODS: We enrolled 97 subjects who were participants in a trial comparing open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These patients had undergone rectal cancer surgery with ileostomy formation. Peristomal adhesions were assessed during ileostomy takedown using an adhesion grading system: (1) no adhesions or fine, filmy adhesions separable by blunt dissection; (2) dense adhesions, separable by sharp dissection; (3) very dense adhesions, resulting in enterotomy and/or requiring extension of the abdominal wall incision.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients underwent laparoscopic resection (group A) and 40 underwent open resection (group B). Operating time for ileostomy dissection was shorter in group A than in group B (14.6 vs. 19.8 min, respectively; p = 0.047). Dense adhesions (grades 2 and 3) were more common in group B (22/40, 55 %) than in group A (12/57, 21 %; p < 0.001). In particular, grade 3 adhesions were present only in group B (6/40).
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that laparoscopic rectal surgery results in less peristomal adhesion formation than does conventional open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884383     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2165-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

Review 1.  Myomectomy. Comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques.

Authors:  C E Miller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Manipulation of the small intestine as a cause of the increased inflammatory response after open compared with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  N Hiki; N Shimizu; H Yamaguchi; K Imamura; K Kami; K Kubota; M Kaminishi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  H M Dowson; J J Bong; D P Lovell; T R Worthington; N D Karanjia; T A Rockall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation.

Authors:  J Thompson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic anterior resection in a porcine model: a pilot study.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; K Skinner; J W Burns; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1996-04

6.  Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study.

Authors:  Zane Cohen; Anthony J Senagore; Merril T Dayton; Mark J Koruda; David E Beck; Bruce G Wolff; Phillip R Fleshner; Richard C Thirlby; Kirk A Ludwig; Sergio W Larach; Eric G Weiss; Joel J Bauer; Lena Holmdahl
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Byung Ho Nam; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Taek-Gu Lee; Dae Yong Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Hye-Seung Lee; Sun Young Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Yong Sang Hong; Jee Hyun Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Authors:  C Bulletti; V Polli; V Negrini; E Giacomucci; C Flamigni
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1996-08

9.  Does sodium hyaluronate- and carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) decrease operative time for loop ileostomy closure?

Authors:  M Salum; S D Wexner; J J Nogueras; E Weiss; M Koruda; K Behrens; S Cohen; S Binderow; J Cohen; A Thorson; C Ternent; M Christenson; G Blatchford; V Pricolo; M Whitehead; K Doveney; J Reilly; E Glennon; S Larach; P Williamson; J Gallagher; A Ferrara; F Harford; R Fry; T Eisenstat; J Notaro; B Chinn; L Yee; M Stamos; P Cole; G Dunn; A Singh
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces abdominal and pelvic adhesions.

Authors:  Adrian A Indar; Jonathan E Efron; Tonia M Young-Fadok
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.