Literature DB >> 16969618

Does sodium hyaluronate- and carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) decrease operative time for loop ileostomy closure?

M Salum1, S D Wexner, J J Nogueras, E Weiss, M Koruda, K Behrens, S Cohen, S Binderow, J Cohen, A Thorson, C Ternent, M Christenson, G Blatchford, V Pricolo, M Whitehead, K Doveney, J Reilly, E Glennon, S Larach, P Williamson, J Gallagher, A Ferrara, F Harford, R Fry, T Eisenstat, J Notaro, B Chinn, L Yee, M Stamos, P Cole, G Dunn, A Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adhesions can result in serious clinical complications and make ileostomy closure, which is relatively simple procedure into a complicated and prolonged one. The use of sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethyl cellulose membrane (Seprafilm) was proven to significantly reduce the postoperative adhesions at the site of application. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and severity of adhesions around a loop ileostomy and to analyze the length of time and morbidity for mobilization at the time of ileostomy closure with and without the use of Seprafilm.
METHODS: Twenty-nine surgeons from 15 institutions participated in this multicenter prospective randomized study. 191 patients with loop ileostomy construction were randomly assigned to either receive Seprafilm under the midline incision and around the stoma (Group I), only under the midline incision (Group II), or not to receive Seprafilm (Group III). At ileostomy closure, adhesions were quantified and graded; operative morbidity was also measured.
RESULTS: All 3 groups were comparable relative to gender, mean age and number of patients with prior operations (26, 25 and 19, respectively). Group II patients were significantly more likely to have pre-existing adhesions than Group III patients (30.6% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.025). At stoma mobilization, significantly more patients in Group III than in Group I had adhesions around the stoma (95.2% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.021). Mean operative times were 27, 25, and 28 minutes, respectively (p = 0.38), with significant differences among sites. There was no significant difference in the number of patients needing myotomy or enterotomy (29, 27 and 24 patients, respectively), nor in the number of postoperative complications (7, 9 and 7 patients, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: When consistently applied, Seprafilm significantly decreased adhesion formation around the stoma but not operative times without any increase in the need for myotomy or enterotomy. These findings were not seen in the overall study population possibly due to the large number of surgeons using a variety of application techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16969618     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-006-0278-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  20 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Use of Sodium Hyaluronate/Carboxymethylcellulose Bioresorbable Membrane in Loop Ileostomy Construction Facilitates Stoma Closure.

Authors:  Danielle M Bertoni; Kerry L Hammond; David E Beck; Terry C Hicks; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David A Margolin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesion: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiqiang Zeng; Zhengping Yu; Jie You; Qiyu Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Seprafilm review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David E Beck
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The adhesions were thick, tenacious, and essentially growing into the serosa of adjacent small bowel loops.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The incidence of stoma related morbidity - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Tam Malik; M J Lee; A B Harikrishnan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Efficacy and safety of a resorbable collagen membrane COVA+™ for the prevention of postoperative adhesions in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  André Dabrowski; Marc Lepère; Constantin Zaranis; Club Coelio; Philippe Hauters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Facilitated early ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a case-matched study.

Authors:  S Memon; A G Heriot; C E Atkin; A C Lynch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  A prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blind phase I-II clinical trial on the safety of A-Part Gel as adhesion prophylaxis after major abdominal surgery versus non-treated group.

Authors:  Reinhold Lang; Petra Baumann; Karl-Walter Jauch; Claudia Schmoor; Christine Weis; Erich Odermatt; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.