Literature DB >> 15868230

Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study.

Zane Cohen1, Anthony J Senagore, Merril T Dayton, Mark J Koruda, David E Beck, Bruce G Wolff, Phillip R Fleshner, Richard C Thirlby, Kirk A Ludwig, Sergio W Larach, Eric G Weiss, Joel J Bauer, Lena Holmdahl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative abdominal adhesions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, placing a substantial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Development of a bioresorbable membrane containing up to 23 percent glycerol and chemically modified sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose offers ease of handling and has been shown to provide significant postoperative adhesion prevention in animals. This study was designed to assess the safety of glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose and to evaluate its efficacy in reducing the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative adhesion development in surgical patients.
METHODS: Twelve centers enrolled 120 patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis who were scheduled for a restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy. Before surgical closure, patients were randomized to no anti-adhesion treatment (control) or treatment with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose membrane under the midline incision. At ileostomy closure, laparoscopy was used to evaluate the incidence, extent, and severity of adhesion formation to the midline incision.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed using the intent-to-treat population. Treatment with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose resulted in 19 of 58 patients (33 percent) with no adhesions compared with 6 of 60 adhesion-free patients (10 percent) in the no treatment control group (P = 0.002). The mean extent of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision was significantly lower among patients treated with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose compared with patients in the control group (P < 0.001). The severity of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision was significantly less with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose than with control (P < 0.001). Adverse events were similar between treatment and no treatment control groups with the exception of abscess and incisional wound complications were more frequently observed with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose.
CONCLUSIONS: Glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose was shown to effectively reduce adhesions to the midline incision and adhesions between the omentum and small bowel after abdominal surgery. Safety profiles for the treatment and no treatment control groups were similar with the exception of more infection complications associated with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose use. Animal models did not predict these complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868230     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0954-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  36 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy.

Authors:  Hussein M Atta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Utilization and safety of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier.

Authors:  Shazia Bashir; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Use of Sodium Hyaluronate/Carboxymethylcellulose Bioresorbable Membrane in Loop Ileostomy Construction Facilitates Stoma Closure.

Authors:  Danielle M Bertoni; Kerry L Hammond; David E Beck; Terry C Hicks; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David A Margolin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesion: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiqiang Zeng; Zhengping Yu; Jie You; Qiyu Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Efficacy and safety of seprafilm: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of peritoneal adhesions in ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Martín-Cartes; Salvador Morales-Conde; Juan Manuel Suárez-Grau; Manuel Bustos-Jiménez; Jean-Marie Hisnard Cadet-Dussort; Francisco López-Bernal; Juan Morcillo-Azcárate; Juan David Tutosaus-Gómez; Salvador Morales-Méndez
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Seprafilm review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David E Beck
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Impact of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Tonia M Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on female fertility: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Siraj G Rajaratnam; Timothy W Eglinton; Phil Hider; Nicola S Fearnhead
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Peer reviewed publications in 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2006
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.