OBJECTIVE: To determine whether change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) would more accurately predict pathological complete response (pCR) than analysing the pre- or post-CRT ADC individually. METHODS: 76 patients with LARC (≥ T3 or lymph node-positive) underwent pre- and post-CRT, 1.5-T diffusion-weighted imaging. A blinded radiologist measured the tumour ADCs. The three measures were compared with regard to CR and non-CR. To calculate accuracy for determining pCR, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was applied to the three measures. RESULTS: The post-CRT ADC (1.43 ± 0.10) (× 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and the percentage change (70.0 ± 23.5%) in the CR (n = 11) were significantly higher than those in the non-CR (n = 65) (1.14 ± 0.18, 30.2 ± 21.7%, respectively)(both, P < 0.0001). The pre-CRT ADC (0.85 ± 0.10) of the pCR did not differ significantly from that of the non-pCR (0.88 ± 0.14)(P = 0.4094). The post-CRT ADC showed comparable relative accuracy for determining pCR to that of the percentage change (P = 0.788). However, overall accuracy of the former (87%) was higher than that of the latter (75%) (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Analyzing post-CRT ADC alone can reliably differentiate pCR from non-pCR in LARC.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) would more accurately predict pathological complete response (pCR) than analysing the pre- or post-CRT ADC individually. METHODS: 76 patients with LARC (≥ T3 or lymph node-positive) underwent pre- and post-CRT, 1.5-T diffusion-weighted imaging. A blinded radiologist measured the tumour ADCs. The three measures were compared with regard to CR and non-CR. To calculate accuracy for determining pCR, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was applied to the three measures. RESULTS: The post-CRT ADC (1.43 ± 0.10) (× 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and the percentage change (70.0 ± 23.5%) in the CR (n = 11) were significantly higher than those in the non-CR (n = 65) (1.14 ± 0.18, 30.2 ± 21.7%, respectively)(both, P < 0.0001). The pre-CRT ADC (0.85 ± 0.10) of the pCR did not differ significantly from that of the non-pCR (0.88 ± 0.14)(P = 0.4094). The post-CRT ADC showed comparable relative accuracy for determining pCR to that of the percentage change (P = 0.788). However, overall accuracy of the former (87%) was higher than that of the latter (75%) (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Analyzing post-CRT ADC alone can reliably differentiate pCR from non-pCR in LARC.
Authors: Julio García-Aguilar; Enrique Hernandez de Anda; Prayuth Sirivongs; Suk-Hwan Lee; Robert D Madoff; David A Rothenberger Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: R Hughes; R Glynne-Jones; J Grainger; P Richman; A Makris; M Harrison; R Ashford; R A Harrison; J I Livingstone; P J McDonald; J Meyrick Thomas; I C Mitchell; J M A Northover; R Phillips; M Wallace; A Windsor; J R Novell Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2005-04-30 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: T Denecke; B Rau; K-T Hoffmann; B Hildebrandt; J Ruf; M Gutberlet; M Hünerbein; R Felix; P Wust; H Amthauer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-04-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Seung Ho Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Min Woo Lee; Gi Hyeon Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Thomas Borschitz; Daniel Wachtlin; Markus Möhler; Heinz Schmidberger; Theodor Junginger Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ewelina Kluza; Esther D Rozeboom; Monique Maas; Milou Martens; Doenja M J Lambregts; Jos Slenter; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephanie Nougaret; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Yulia Lakhman; Romain Sudre; Richard K G Do; Frederic Bibeau; David Azria; Eric Assenat; Nicolas Molinari; Marie-Ange Pierredon; Philippe Rouanet; Boris Guiu Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Hylke J F Brenkman; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Frank J Wessels; Marcel Verheij; Edwin P M Jansen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Michaela Cellina; Antonio Esposito; Giulia Agostini; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Alessandro Ambrosi; Carlo Socci; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 5.315