Literature DB >> 23884015

Understanding adaptive motor control of the paretic upper limb early poststroke: the EXPLICIT-stroke program.

Joost van Kordelaar1, Erwin E H van Wegen, Rinske H M Nijland, Andreas Daffertshofer, Gert Kwakkel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During upper limb motor recovery after stroke, the greatest improvements occur typically in the first 5 weeks poststroke. It is unclear what patients learn during this early phase of recovery.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypothesis that, early poststroke, patients learn to master the degrees of freedom in the paretic upper limb as reflected by dissociated shoulder and elbow movements during reach-to-grasp.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke were included. Repeated 3-dimensional kinematic measurements were conducted at 14, 25, 38, 57, 92, and 189 days poststroke. Trunk, shoulder, elbow, and wrist rotations were measured during a reach-to-grasp task. Using principal component analysis the longitudinal changes in dissociated upper limb movements during reach-to-grasp were investigated. Twelve healthy subjects were included for comparison.
RESULTS: The main coordination pattern during reach-to-grasp in patients with stroke and healthy subjects consisted mostly of horizontal shoulder adduction and elbow extension. The standard deviation of this main pattern increased over time, with the largest increase in the first 5 weeks poststroke (F = 5.5, P < .001), but remained smaller than in healthy individuals. The standard deviation increased by 0.46° per day between 14 and 38 days and tapered off to 0.05° per day between 38 and 189 days poststroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that restitution of motor control by dissociation of shoulder and elbow movements occurs mainly early poststroke. However, compared with healthy adults, most patients did not achieve fully dissociated upper limb movements at 26 weeks poststroke, suggesting that upper limb motor control after stroke remains adaptive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kinematics; motor recovery; reaching; stroke; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23884015     DOI: 10.1177/1545968313496327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  19 in total

1.  A Short and Distinct Time Window for Recovery of Arm Motor Control Early After Stroke Revealed With a Global Measure of Trajectory Kinematics.

Authors:  Juan C Cortes; Jeff Goldsmith; Michelle D Harran; Jing Xu; Nathan Kim; Heidi M Schambra; Andreas R Luft; Pablo Celnik; John W Krakauer; Tomoko Kitago
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Portable Myoelectric Brace Use Increases Upper Extremity Recovery and Participation But Does Not Impact Kinematics in Chronic, Poststroke Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Nienke W Willigenburg; Michael P McNally; Timothy E Hewett; Stephen J Page
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Motor Learning in Stroke: Trained Patients Are Not Equal to Untrained Patients With Less Impairment

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Vikram A Rajan; Amy J Bastian; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Does training with traditionally presented and virtually simulated tasks elicit differing changes in object interaction kinematics in persons with upper extremity hemiparesis?

Authors:  Gerard G Fluet; Alma S Merians; Qinyin Qiu; Maryam Rohafaza; Anita M VanWingerden; S V Adamovich
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 5.  Translational Hurdles in Stroke Recovery Studies.

Authors:  Jukka Jolkkonen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 6.  Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Janne M Veerbeek; Erwin E H van Wegen; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 7.  The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Beth Clark; Jill Whitall; Gert Kwakkel; Jan Mehrholz; Sean Ewings; Jane Burridge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-25

8.  The impact of recovery of visuo-spatial neglect on motor recovery of the upper paretic limb after stroke.

Authors:  Tanja C W Nijboer; Boudewijn J Kollen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients.

Authors:  Nathanaël Jarrassé; Tommaso Proietti; Vincent Crocher; Johanna Robertson; Anis Sahbani; Guillaume Morel; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  NeuroControl of movement: system identification approach for clinical benefit.

Authors:  Carel G M Meskers; Jurriaan H de Groot; Erwin de Vlugt; Alfred C Schouten
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.