BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate that most arm motor recovery occurs within three months after stroke, when measured with standard clinical scales. Improvements on these measures, however, reflect a combination of recovery in motor control, increases in strength, and acquisition of compensatory strategies. OBJECTIVE: To isolate and characterize the time course of recovery of arm motor control over the first year poststroke. METHODS: Longitudinal study of 18 participants with acute ischemic stroke. Motor control was evaluated using a global kinematic measure derived from a 2-dimensional reaching task designed to minimize the need for antigravity strength and prevent compensation. Arm impairment was evaluated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE), activity limitation with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and strength with biceps dynamometry. Assessments were conducted at: 1.5, 5, 14, 27, and 54 weeks poststroke. RESULTS: Motor control in the paretic arm improved up to week 5, with no further improvement beyond this time point. In contrast, improvements in the FMA-UE, ARAT, and biceps dynamometry continued beyond 5 weeks, with a similar magnitude of improvement between weeks 5 and 54 as the one observed between weeks 1.5 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery after stroke plateaued much earlier for arm motor control, isolated with a global kinematic measure, compared to motor function assessed with clinical scales. This dissociation between the time courses of kinematic and clinical measures of recovery may be due to the contribution of strength improvement to the latter. Novel interventions, focused on the first month poststroke, will be required to exploit the narrower window of spontaneous recovery for motor control.
BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate that most arm motor recovery occurs within three months after stroke, when measured with standard clinical scales. Improvements on these measures, however, reflect a combination of recovery in motor control, increases in strength, and acquisition of compensatory strategies. OBJECTIVE: To isolate and characterize the time course of recovery of arm motor control over the first year poststroke. METHODS: Longitudinal study of 18 participants with acute ischemic stroke. Motor control was evaluated using a global kinematic measure derived from a 2-dimensional reaching task designed to minimize the need for antigravity strength and prevent compensation. Arm impairment was evaluated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE), activity limitation with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and strength with biceps dynamometry. Assessments were conducted at: 1.5, 5, 14, 27, and 54 weeks poststroke. RESULTS: Motor control in the paretic arm improved up to week 5, with no further improvement beyond this time point. In contrast, improvements in the FMA-UE, ARAT, and biceps dynamometry continued beyond 5 weeks, with a similar magnitude of improvement between weeks 5 and 54 as the one observed between weeks 1.5 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery after stroke plateaued much earlier for arm motor control, isolated with a global kinematic measure, compared to motor function assessed with clinical scales. This dissociation between the time courses of kinematic and clinical measures of recovery may be due to the contribution of strength improvement to the latter. Novel interventions, focused on the first month poststroke, will be required to exploit the narrower window of spontaneous recovery for motor control.
Entities:
Keywords:
kinematics; motor recovery; reaching; stroke; upper limb
Authors: Scott Barbay; Erik J Plautz; Kathleen M Friel; Shawn B Frost; Numa Dancause; Ann M Stowe; Randolph J Nudo Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2005-11-05 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Brandon Rohrer; Susan Fasoli; Hermano Igo Krebs; Richard Hughes; Bruce Volpe; Walter R Frontera; Joel Stein; Neville Hogan Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Heidi M Schambra; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Martin Lindquist; Jasim Uddin; Levke Steiner; Benjamin Hertler; Nathan Kim; Jessica Berard; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas Luft; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Jing Xu; Naveed Ejaz; Benjamin Hertler; Meret Branscheidt; Mario Widmer; Andreia V Faria; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Nathan Kim; Pablo A Celnik; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas R Luft; John W Krakauer; Jörn Diedrichsen Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: David Beckwée; Lotte Cuypers; Nina Lefeber; Emma De Keersmaecker; Ellen Scheys; Wout Van Hees; Stany Perkisas; Sylvie De Raedt; Eric Kerckhofs; Ivan Bautmans; Eva Swinnen Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Alkis M Hadjiosif; Meret Branscheidt; Manuel A Anaya; Keith D Runnalls; Jennifer Keller; Amy J Bastian; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 2.714